tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25646979.post362312179755349492..comments2024-01-01T15:35:12.954-07:00Comments on Simple Utah Mormon Politics: Craig Frank is a Resident of Utah District 57 as Evidenced by Two Out of Three Constitutional IndicatorsFrank Stahelihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01822334061980912687noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25646979.post-27852925216841516512011-01-18T22:03:38.204-07:002011-01-18T22:03:38.204-07:00Anonymous wrote: "If the new city boundary wa...Anonymous wrote: "If the new city boundary was in place prior to the State Map for LD 57 was adopted and If Under 36-1-204 Craig is ruled to be in his district, he will be seated."<br /><br />The city boundary was in place prior to teh state map here's a short video that lays out the entire timeline:<br /><br />http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeIf2_YEbVoFrankie Rayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16905287812386785084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25646979.post-82718511669224091772011-01-18T22:01:56.402-07:002011-01-18T22:01:56.402-07:00JBT: Actually yes, I would justify "a non-LDS...JBT: Actually yes, I would justify "a non-LDS Democratic Representative keeping his seat under the same circumstances". It's a matter of constitutionality, not a matter of religion or party.Frank Stahelihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01822334061980912687noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25646979.post-90623225653999356082011-01-18T20:15:12.408-07:002011-01-18T20:15:12.408-07:00Bravo Frank. Irrational rationalization at its fi...Bravo Frank. Irrational rationalization at its finest! Would you turn yourself inside out like this to try to justify a non-LDS Democratic Representative keeping his seat under the same circumstances?<br /><br />I guess you Franks need to stick together.JBTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25646979.post-77490549390315939762011-01-17T22:34:55.708-07:002011-01-17T22:34:55.708-07:00If the new city boundary was in place prior to the...If the new city boundary was in place prior to the State Map for LD 57 was adopted and If Under 36-1-204 Craig is ruled to be in his district, he will be seated. If not, the Old/New City boundary for the north part of LD 57 should be brought to the House for their opinion of intent of the boundary for LD 57. If it is then decided that he lives in LD 57, he should be seated.<br /><br />If the above 2 fail, he should not be seated, nor an attempt be made, as he would not live in LD 57.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25646979.post-15158548763516893192011-01-17T21:30:43.168-07:002011-01-17T21:30:43.168-07:002 out of 3? Good golly, lets give him the White H...2 out of 3? Good golly, lets give him the White House.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com