Skip to main content

Vouchers Improve Educational Opportunities for All


Utahns are starting to see the benefits of educational choice that vouchers can provide. I think that is a healthy development. As we know we don't have a captive audience, it becomes more important to provide a product that people will want to consume. Education is such a product.

For the first time since such polls have been conducted, there are now more Utahns that favor education vouchers for children than don't. This is a great development. As more people contemplate the importance of a good education and how more choices contribute to that end, I expect these numbers to go up.

I also am pleased with the excellence in education that public charter schools have fostered. My children attend such a charter school campus, where administrators and educators are truly committed to providing both excellence in educational instruction and high expectations when it comes to good citizenship.

School vouchers can only improve this development, giving families across the economic scale better opportunities to educate their children.

It is human nature (for most people) to be kind and courteous. It has always been a mainstay of American society, promulgated from religious and other traditional values, that if I am kind to others, I can expect others to--and they will likely--be kind to me.

It is not human nature, however, to excel in creativity. The greatness of competition (as long as it is not cut-throat or otherwise unethical or illegal) is that it fosters new and improved ways of doing things. Anyone who claims to want more and better education for our children should welcome the improvements that can occur through greater choice in education.

Educational vouchers are one means to promulgate such improvement through choice.

Comments

  1. How do you define cut-throat, unethical or illegal? Because the current voucher proposals raise some definite red flags. One side can pick and choose which clients they want to serve. The other side must serve any client that walks through the door. One side can charge extra money for the service it provides. The other side is prohibited to charge. One side can hire any employees it chooses and has no acountability standards it is required to meet. The other side is highly regulated, with benchmarks it must meet, or lose funding. That doesn't sound like fair competition.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Natalie,

    Thanks for your comments. You are right--it is not fair. I'm not sure how to deal with the fact that "only one side can pick and choose". You are right that the private educational sector can charge extra money for its services, but it can also charge less money for its services--which it usually does. The public side IS too highly regulated--by the federal government "with benchmarks it must meet, or lose funding." I think federal oversight of Utah Public Education is a detriment which should be done away with. It is also too highly regulated in that poor-performing teachers cannot easily be let go, and that it is much to difficult to remove highly disruptive students from the classroom. I support improvements in these areas.

    The fairness issue you raise, however, completely regards the public vs. private educational establishments. My concern is that when it comes to long-term fairness, the children should be given exclusive consideration. It is clear that children will generally be educated better when there are more educational choices.

    And in this long-term, more educators will be given an opportunity to teach in much less onerously regulated environments.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One idea is to remove the Federal Government from the business of education. Overly bureaucratic public education is good for no one. Competition within the private sector will take care of exorbitant prices.

    I wouldn't blame vouchers for the stiff requirements given to public education, but I would say that is a serious concern. Any good voucher proposal would not take more from public schools than it would cost to educate the student, were they to remain. Any extra that private schools charged would need to be met by that student--not the government.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...