Skip to main content

Another Reason to Get Rid of the IRS


You may not want to read this post, because you might find out that you are breaking the law, too! It has just come to my attention that I am a miscreant because I have not been itemizing and reporting to my employer my cell phone usage into business vs. personal minutes. It will cost my employer more money for me to do that each month than my monthly phone bill costs!


There are things that the IRS does that tick me off, and there are things they do that are beyond explanation. I found one, and apparently, I and my co-workers have been breaking this law for quite some time.

Here is an excerpt from an e-mail that I just received, entitled "2nd Request-URGENT!! Important Cell Phone Tax Implications".

Dear Cellular Phone Subscriber,

A previous communication was sent to you on July 6, 2007 and we do not have a record of a response. You are receiving this because our records indicate that you have a cell phone ... which is paid for by [the company]... The IRS requires that personal use of employer-provided cell phones must be taxed to individuals as additional compensation.


Do people really use their cell phones that much that it would mean a substantial difference in their tax liability?

Give me a break!

Has anybody heard of this malarkey before? It sounds like we have at least one too many lawyers in our legal department.

Oh well, I'm off to spend $50+ to calculate how many minutes of my $44 phone bill were personal minutes. Bye!

Labels

Labels:

Comments

  1. pramahaphil7/31/2007 11:10:00 AM

    Welcome to my world. I get to inform people of stuff like this on a regular basis.

    I am shocked that your celluar provider is involved. I haven't seen that happen before.

    ReplyDelete
  2. pramahaphil7/31/2007 11:12:00 AM

    I'm on Bluff if you ever need any help.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Frank Staheli7/31/2007 01:42:00 PM

    When you say "I am shocked that your cellular provider is involved," do you mean you are shocked that I have to declare my personal cell phone minutes as income?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Scott Hinrichs7/31/2007 08:19:00 PM

    True confessions: I spent the first part of my career working for the IRS -- as a tax auditor, no less. Now take a deep breath.

    Let me first come to the aid of my former employer. This is not all the fault of the IRS. You ought to actually read the tax laws passed by our federal legislators. Heaven knows that few of them do so. This kind of nitpicky crap is often codified in the law. If you wonder how that kind of thing happens, think about lobbyists plus the art of compromise and working a bill through the process.

    Then there are treasury regulations that are written by unelected bureaucrats that help -- uh -- clarify the Internal Revenue Code. A not insignificant amount of the insidious nitpicking comes from this source. And the lines of accountability of these bureaucrats to the citizen voters and their elected representatives is fuzzy at best.

    The IRS takes all of these multituninous pages of legalese and works with a force of people (mainly GS-9 level or below) to implement these laws and regs. Each of these people is indoctrinated and steeped in the culture of the bureaucracy. The truly amazing thing is that IRS does its job as well it they does.

    Our tax system stinks. IRS is the face of our tax system, and they certainly do their share to make life difficult for taxpayers. But let's not forget the guys up the line that are the real sources of IRS hubris: Senators, Congressional Representatives, and administration bureaucrats.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.
2 comments
Read more

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...
66 comments
Read more

American Energy Independence: I Support "All of the Above"

Of course it will take several years to develop new domestic petroleum production. But it will take a lot longer to develop a lot of other alternative energy sources. I would LOVE to not have to rely on oil for anything, but that's a ways off. That's why I support the latest legislation in Congress that supports "All of the Above"--developing all energy sources, including oil, so that we can be energy independent. It really drives me nuts when people say we shouldn't develop domestic oil production because it won't be productive for 7-10 years. That would be a workable argument if we could have enough alternative energy by that time that we wouldn't need oil. I don't think, though, that anybody believes that. In congress recently, legislation was introduced to do encourage the development of all forms of energy. HR 6656, also known as " All of the Above ", will solve that problem, but apparently Nancy Pelosi thinks that at least two ...
54 comments
Read more