Skip to main content

Hillary Roars Back: What Did I Tell You?

I told you two weeks ago that Hillary Clinton was nowhere near finished with her presidential campaign. James Carville and others were preparing her epitaph, because she wouldn't win both Texas and Ohio, which would doom her campaign. How do you like the looks of my latest conspiracy theory now?

There was no question in my mind that Hillary would win both Texas and Ohio, because the establishment has already ordained Hillary the next US Minister of Socialism. The campaign still makes for good theatrics, but it was never in doubt that Clinton wins in Ohio and Texas would be carefully orchestrated. It will be close, because close bolsters ratings, but Hillary will get the nod in the end. (It's "too bad" that Ron Paul isn't Establishment material--otherwise, the media could have a double-dip a great ratings.)
Clinton's triumphs ended a month of defeats for the former first lady, who told jubilant supporters, "We're going on, we're going strong and we're going all the way."

Seriously...are you really surprised?

My first clue that I was right on target was when the guy called in to the Glenn Beck program yesterday saying that everyone in Ohio that had been registered Republican was now registered as unaffiliated. Hmmmm.....now what could that mean? If it were to help a particular candidate, who might that be? Especially after Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter asked Republicans to torpedo the Democrats by voting for Hillary.

A friend of mine asked me last Saturday if I still stand by my Hillary Conspiracy. I told him that I did. Last night's results didn't surprise me in the least.

Barack Obama is young. He'll have another chance. But Hillary has paid her dues through such things as Hillarycare and schmoozing with the Chinese.

It's Hillary's turn. Unfortunately, she will be president. Ohio and Texas were but light snacks for her on the road to the White House.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Anonymous3/05/2008 08:00:00 AM

    What do you make of the higher percentage of Republicans / independents who voted for Obama?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Frank Staheli3/05/2008 09:01:00 AM

    That appeared to be so before yesterday's vote. Did it actually occur?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Obi wan liberali3/05/2008 09:23:00 AM

    Actually, more Republicans and independents voted for Obama. That is one reason I support Obama, because I think he has a better chance at uniting our deeply divided country than Hillary does.

    I do disagree with you regarding Hillary as a socialist. Socialism to me is public ownership of the means of production. Hillary certainly favors a more involved federal government than most conservatives, but calling her a socialist is a little extreme IMNSHO.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Frank Staheli3/05/2008 09:39:00 AM

    If that's true (that more Repubs and Indys voted for Obama), then Obama is screwed. That bolsters my conspiracy theory even more.

    Just Hillary's intended control of the health care system makes her pretty socialist to me.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Frank Staheli3/05/2008 02:15:00 PM

    Here's what Newsmax is reporting: Republicans in Texas helped Clinton.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ken3/05/2008 03:47:00 PM

    A brokered convention is all but inevitable. Rush Limbaugh's plan worked to a tee.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ken3/06/2008 06:57:00 PM

    Hillary is the Democrat establishment. Believe me she will stop at nothing to dig what ever dirt she can to put the fear of Hillary in to the hearts of any one of them that dare switch to Obama. In a brokered convention she will come out the victor no matter what it takes.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...
67 comments
Read more

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...
50 comments
Read more

One Sure Thing about Global Warming: Loss of Liberty

In all of my reading about man-made global warming, never once have I come across the statement that 'we are absolutely sure' that mankind is causing irreversible global warming by our behavior. No one has dared make this claim yet. The closest anyone has come is being pretty sure that something bad might happen in fifty to one hundred years if we don't act now. One thing that several people have stated (on both sides of the debate), however, is that slowing the supposed effects caused by man on the warming of the globe will require significant strengthening of governments around the world, along with a significant reduction in your freedom to choose. My religion teaches You may think, from this article, that I am having a hard time separating my views of church from my views of state. That would be correct. that there was a great war in heaven between two ideologies. The first faction advocated our Heavenly Father's plan, which was a blueprint for freedom of choice...
51 comments
Read more