Skip to main content

The Ugliest American: Breaking the Vicious Cycle

It's hard to imagine that approximately eight years ago George Bush gave the ugly American speech. An ugly American, he said, is someone who makes the rest of the world do it our way. Now, ironically these eight years later, he has seemingly forgotten his own words, and he is the ugliest American of them all. It will take much more than we think we're capable of to rid ourselves of this stain on the American character.

Back when he was campaigning, and when he, astonishingly to me, seemed normal to just about half of American voters, George W. Bush had an interesting perspective on nation building. He was positively agin' it. Or so he said.

Who said the following?
I think one way for us to end up being viewed as ‘the ugly American’ is for us to go around the world saying, ‘We do it this way; so should you.’
..and this...
…I don’t think our troops ought to be used for what’s called ‘nation building.’
...and this?
If we’re an arrogant nation, they’ll resent us. If we’re a humble nation, but strong, they’ll welcome us.
Answer: George W. Bush. What in the world happened to the 'humble' President Bush?

Answer: It was a sham!

Hardly before the paint

George W. Bush is the ugliest American. Americans are at near consensus on the issue. Citizens of countries around the globe feel sorry for us.

I never voted for him. But I'll bet you did. And now you're planning on voting for one of three cookie cutter establishment replacements--Larry Obama, Mo McCain, or Curly Clinton?

dried on his new oval office name plate, he was scheming to build democracy, American style, in foreign lands. Bush's scheme couldn't have been more nimbly aided by the 9/11 terrorist attacks, after which the country would do anything for him. Interestingly, it now appears that his schemes were already well developed before his presidential name plate was even painted. So we went to Iraq on the grandest of pretexts.

And we're still there. George W. Bush has no excuse for being the ugliest American, but he nonetheless is. Americans are at near consensus on the issue. Citizens of countries around the globe feel sorry for us.

I never voted for him--never once. But I'll bet you did. And now I'll bet you're planning on voting for one of his three cookie cutter establishment replacements:
  • Larry Obama
  • Mo McCain
  • or Curly Clinton
Some choice! Tell me you're not that dense!

George W. Bush got into office on patently disingenuous platitudes. He is either a liar or a puppet. Which one is it?

These are the only two choices in retrospect. And neither one is pretty.

Let's not let it happen again. I'm getting sick of ugly presidents.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...