Skip to main content

How Did the Universe Come to Be? You Have to Take It On Faith

Has the universe always existed?  Rather, did it have its beginning in a big bang?  Or did God create it?  Interestingly, no matter what your opinion is on the matter, it cannot be scientifically proven.  Every finite human opinion about the origin and purpose of the universe must rest on faith.
Share/Save/Bookmark
Religious zealots sometimes claim that God created the entire universe. Over-zealous scientists seem smugly sure that it had its beginning with a large explosion. Some even think that the universe has somehow just been here from eternity and will be here until eternity.

Will we know the answer someday to the question of how and why the universe got here?  I think we will.  But we finite humans sure don't know the answer now.  No matter what anybody says.

C. S. Lewis explains, in "Mere Christianity" that these ideas turn up everywhere in the form of a religion-vs-science controversy.
But why anything comes to be there at all, and whether there is anything behind the things science observes--something of a different kind--this is not a scientific question.  Supposing science ever became so complete so that it knew every single thing in the whole universe. Is it not plain that the questions, 'Why is there a universe?' 'Why does it go on as it does?' 'Has it any meaning?' would remain just as they were?

Similarly, in his book "The Devil's Delusion" David Berlinski reminds us that
Confident assertions by scientists that in the privacy of their chambers they have demostrated that God does not exist have nothing to do with science, and even less to do with God's existence. We do not know how the universe began. We do not know why it is there.  On these and many other points as well, the great scientific theories have lapsed.

I do not know whether any of this is true[, but] I am certain that the scientific community does not know that it is false.

Let neither science nor religion fool you. There are just some questions that we not only don't know the answers to, but whose answers we aren't capable of comprehending.  Some day I think we'll probably know everything. But for now, no matter how you slice it, we all have to have a little faith.

This article is dedicated to the memory of my deceased friend and mentor, Thomas Kent Hinckley, a man of encyclopedic wisdom. If there were someone who does know the answer to these questions, it would be him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

American Energy Independence: I Support "All of the Above"

Of course it will take several years to develop new domestic petroleum production. But it will take a lot longer to develop a lot of other alternative energy sources. I would LOVE to not have to rely on oil for anything, but that's a ways off. That's why I support the latest legislation in Congress that supports "All of the Above"--developing all energy sources, including oil, so that we can be energy independent. It really drives me nuts when people say we shouldn't develop domestic oil production because it won't be productive for 7-10 years. That would be a workable argument if we could have enough alternative energy by that time that we wouldn't need oil. I don't think, though, that anybody believes that. In congress recently, legislation was introduced to do encourage the development of all forms of energy. HR 6656, also known as " All of the Above ", will solve that problem, but apparently Nancy Pelosi thinks that at least two ...