Skip to main content

Why is America So Ignorant of Other Nations?

In 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville, during his tour of America, was surprised by Americans' lack of interest in other nations and cultures. This is still the case today. Why is it so? There are some good reasons, and there are some embarrassing ones.

About half of American congress people don't possess passports.  So says Derek Leebaert in his recent book, Magic and Mayhem: The Delusions of American Foreign Policy. Before becoming president of the United States, George W Bush had only been outside the United States a handful of times, and never for more than a few days. And in general, Americans are quite ignorant of other cultures and nations when compared with what they know about us. But why?

Why don't we care about other nations as much as they care about us? Do we think we are we better than them? Or are we just too busy? Probably a little bit of both.

"[We] believe", says Leebaert, "with good cause, that [we] live in the most fascinating of all countries. Bright, outgoing people find more than enough to occupy them[selves] right here."

America seems to be the most accepting nation when it comes to assimilating legal immigrants (illegal immigrants are completely different story, however). Interestingly as well, immigrants usually integrate quickly into American society, often losing any affinity for their mother country by the second or third generation, developing the same lack of curiosity for "outsiders" that their fellow Americans already possess.

Maybe that's the foundation of why we think we're better than everyone else. Maybe this is why half of the US personnel in Baghdad never once ventured outside the so-called "Green Zone" while they were in Iraq. Is this why, at one point, only 6 out of 1,000 US staff in Baghdad spoke fluent Arabic, while among their British and French counterparts the proportion was much, much higher? Why did so few American military and civilian personnel in Iraq know next to nothing about the differences between Sunni and Shia Islam.  Why did the US military in most cases provide culture briefings to its soldiers heading to Iraq and Afghanistan that weren't even good enough to be called "abysmal"?

Why are we so ignorant of other countries? Do we think we have nothing to learn from them? Ironically, whether we talk of Korea, Iraq, Vietnam, or Afghanistan, our greatest military defeats would likely have been successes had we cared to know much at all about the countries we set out to conquer or democratize.

A campaign staffer of a 2008 Presidential candidate captured the ignorant perception of too many Americans that France, Germany, and other European Union states "have a third world standard of living." Although America has truly been on the forefront of excellent innovation, Americans have in the past been too often surprised that great ideas and inventions can also come from someplace other than America.

During the 2000 presidential election, George W Bush opined that America would be most respected and effective in the world if we were "a humble nation." Humble nations, though, rather than trying to foist democracy on third world nations, are contemplative of what they don't know, and they show respect to other nations and cultures by consistently attempting to know more about them. In this area, although it is not a problem that has cropped up recently, America needs a lot of work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...