Skip to main content

LDS Doctrine is Established by the Church and Not by Its Detractors

Anti-Mormon critics often set up as a straw man the claim that the LDS Church  teaches that prophets are infallible. It does not. Antagonists cite, for example, the talk "14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet" as well as the song primary children are taught called "Follow the Prophet".  It is not fair to take such things out of the context of how LDS Doctrine is really established. Detractors from the Church do not make LDS doctrine. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints does.


Several instances exist in the Doctrine and Covenants where Joseph Smith, the LDS Prophet during the time when most of the D&C revelations were received, was chastised for mistakes he had made while as prophet. From the outset, then, it has been clearly demonstrated that LDS leaders are fallible.

One of the major hangups people have with the LDS Church is a misinterpretation of LDS President Ezra Taft Benson's speech, "14 Fundamentals in Following the Prophet" which includes the statement that the prophet will never lead the Church astray.  Those who misunderstand Benson's words think that thereby the LDS Church teaches that prophets are infallible. It does no such thing. It is true that the prophet will never lead the Church astray, but that is in large part because the same Holy Spirit that animates and teaches prophets should animate and teach members of the Church as well, helping us to see when he when a prophet is speaking as a prophet and when he is speaking his own opinion.

Unfortunately, there is some celebrity that follows being an LDS Prophet or Apostle or some other general leader of the Church.  This should not be. With that celebrity comes the mistake of treating as infallible truth not only everything such leaders say, but especially what is published in books under their authorship  This also should not be.  Joseph Fielding Smith warned about such shortsightedness:
You cannot accept the books written by the authorities of the Church as standards in doctrine... Every man who writes is responsible, not the Church, for what he writes. If Joseph Fielding Smith writes something which is out of harmony with the revelations, then every member of the Church is duty-bound to reject it.
It is important for members of the Church--and especially missionaries--to not allow anti-Mormons to dictate to them what the Church supposedly teaches.  Perhaps the most prominent of such foistings by detractors whose goal is really to destroy the Church rather than to be truthful, is "The Adam/God Theory" that Brigham Young may or may not have taught.  Regardless of what Brigham Young said, this theory is not and never has been LDS Church doctrine.  If it were a doctrine of the Church, we'd be teaching it from time to time in Sunday School and hearing about it every now and then in LDS General Conference. That doesn't happen.

Does the LDS Church have an official position on the Theory of Evolution?  No, it does not.  It leaves research on such scientific issues to the scientists.  However, does the LDS Church have a position on the origin of man? Yes, it does. That much has been revealed.  The LDS First presidency issued a statement in 1909 that clarified that humanity is the offspring of divine parents and not part of the same evolutionary process as the animals.


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...