Skip to main content

Libyan Weapons, Turkey, Syria, and the Strange Death of Chris Stevens

Was the death of US Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi related to the running of Libyan weapons stockpiles through Turkey to Syrian freedom fighters? Circumstantial evidence makes it a strong possibility. Here's what I've found so far.

One thing that seems to not be in dispute is that weapons supplied through Libya have turned up in rebel hands in Mali and Algeria. However, this article claims that the US is NOT one of such suppliers.  France, reputedly one of the suppliers, sees that it may have been a mistake to facilitate such movements, as Libyan Touareg fighters have joined rebel forces in the other two countries. Only 3 of more than 30 rebels who recently attacked an Algerian natural gas facility were actually Algerians. Unguarded weapons caches apparently exist all over Libya.

This article alleges that while the official US position is not to supply weapons to Syria, that may actually BE related to the reason that Ambassador Chris Stevens was killed there:

In November of 2011, Libya, fresh off winning liberation for its own country, decided that it wanted to help Syria do the same thing. With this in mind, a man named Abdulhakim Belhadj traveled to Syria to meet with rebel leaders. At about the same time, increasing amounts of footage appeared on Youtube encouraging Libyan freedom fighters to join their compatriots in Syria

In March of that year, Chris Stevens had been appointed by the Obama administration to be the liaison with the new Libyan government. At the time, “Clinton said the United States would do more than just provide humanitarian aid, but she did not get into specifics.” It appears that Stevens had been in contact with Belhadj.

Stevens had apparently not been in Libya in nearly a year when he returned just before the 9/11/12 attack that took his life, and that it’s hard to imagine otherwise why only a 5-person skeleton crew was on hand.

This Reuters article points out that the CIA Post in Benghazi was “a base for, among other things, collecting information on the proliferation of weaponry looted from Libyan government arsenals, including surface-to-air missiles.” The last known business of Chris Stevens was a visit with Turkish Consul General Ali Sait Akin, who left the American embassy compound only about one hour before the attack that took Stevens’s life.

Fox news at that time reported that a large Libyan ship, reportedly carrying weapons, docked at a Turkish port on September 6, 2012, just five days before Ambassador Stevens was killed.  Also, “a source told Fox News that Stevens was in Benghazi to negotiate a weapons transfer, an effort to get SA-7 missiles out of the hands of Libya-based extremists."  Fox goes on to say that “A congressional source also cautioned against drawing premature conclusions about the consulate attack and the movement of weapons from Libya to Syria via Turkey -- noting they may in fact be two separate and distinct events. But the source acknowledged the timing and the meeting between the Turkish diplomat and Stevens was "unusual."

In this video of Hillary Clinton's recent testimony before the Senate, Clinton claims that "it is, from my perspective, less important today, looking backwards, as to why these militants decided to do it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we'll figure out what was going on in the meantime."




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...