Skip to main content

"You'll Be the Cleanest Person in The Room!!!..."

Although I consider myself a very active member of the LDS Church, some things about Mormon culture drive me bonkers.  For example, tell me if you've heard this inaccuracy during the baptismal service for a child.

I haven't heard it a million times, but I've heard it a lot at baptismal services in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Most baptismal services, besides a couple of musical numbers, contain two talks--one person talks about  the significance of baptism, and another person talks about the importance of the Holy Ghost.

Quite often, the person giving the talk about baptism says, looking directly at the child(ren) being baptized, something like the following: "Right after you get baptized, you will be the cleanest person in the room."  And most everyone in the service finds great awe and inspiration over that statement.  But you know what? That statement is at best misleading, and it is at worst flat out wrong.

 It exhibits--and teaches--a profound misunderstanding of the Atonement of Jesus Christ.  It teaches guilt.

I distinctly remember personally misunderstanding the atonement right after my baptism 42 years ago. And I still wish someone had taught me the much more comforting reality.  I remember distinctly being worried--and I've heard several other Mormons express the same worry--that I could only be clean for just a few minutes, until I began sinning again.  I wish I'd known of this truth taught by Elder M Russell Ballard of the LDS Quorum of 12 Apostles:
[G]uilt is not a proper motivational technique for leaders and teachers of the gospel of Jesus Christ. We must always motivate through love and sincere appreciation, not by creating guilt.
That trite phrase uttered by many an LDS baptismal service speaker is not a correct understanding of baptism or of the atonement.  Baptism should really be understood as the beginning of a regular process instead of a one-time event. Elder D. Todd Christofferson says:
[Through baptism] we qualify for a remission of sins by the grace of Jesus Christ through the baptism of the Spirit (see 2 Nephi 31:17). [But just as important], the baptismal covenant applies prospectively as well as retrospectively: each time we truly repent, that covenant is reinvigorated and we once again qualify for a remission of sins.
How do we know that we have received a remission of our sins, that we are clean?  By our sensing the presence of the Holy Spirit in our lives.  President Henry B Eyring taught that
If you have felt the influence of the Holy Ghost during this day, or even this evening, you may take it as evidence that the Atonement is working in your life. For that reason and many others, you would do well to put yourself in places and in tasks that invite the promptings of the Holy Ghost. Feeling the influence of the Holy Ghost works both ways: the Holy Ghost only dwells in a clean temple, and the reception of the Holy Ghost cleanses us through the Atonement of Jesus Christ.

The path to receiving the Holy Ghost is to exercise faith in Christ unto repentance. We can become clean through qualifying for the effects of the Savior’s Atonement. The covenants offered in baptism by authorized servants of God bring that cleansing. We renew our pledge to keep those covenants each time we partake of the sacrament. And the peace we all seek is the assurance that we have received forgiveness for our sins.
So the next time you attend an LDS baptismal service, and if someone uses the "you'll be the cleanest person in the room" mantra again, take a look around the room and smile. Because in reality, due to the matchless Atonement of Jesus Christ, there are probably quite a number of cleanest people in that room.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...

One Sure Thing about Global Warming: Loss of Liberty

In all of my reading about man-made global warming, never once have I come across the statement that 'we are absolutely sure' that mankind is causing irreversible global warming by our behavior. No one has dared make this claim yet. The closest anyone has come is being pretty sure that something bad might happen in fifty to one hundred years if we don't act now. One thing that several people have stated (on both sides of the debate), however, is that slowing the supposed effects caused by man on the warming of the globe will require significant strengthening of governments around the world, along with a significant reduction in your freedom to choose. My religion teaches You may think, from this article, that I am having a hard time separating my views of church from my views of state. That would be correct. that there was a great war in heaven between two ideologies. The first faction advocated our Heavenly Father's plan, which was a blueprint for freedom of choice...