Skip to main content

It Was Never LDS Doctrine That Blacks Were Less Valiant in Pre-Mortality

Was it ever an LDS doctrine that blacks were less faithful in pre-mortality?  NO.

Although LDS Church President Brigham Young, as well as some apostles opined such things, the answer to my question is NO.  Such an idea was never unanimously accepted as doctrine by the general councils of the Church as is required (see Doctrine and Covenants section 107).

I am aware of only one statement ever expressed in an LDS General conference to the effect that blacks were less valiant in pre-mortality (by Apostle George F Richards).  Since then, several statements have been made to rebut such an opinion.

Was such a thing taught over the pulpit in LDS congregations?  Besides the one time in LDS General Conference that I am aware of, I was a participant in an LDS Sunday School class at about the age of 12 where I was taught this concept. I distinctly remember

  • Which room of our church meetinghouse I was when I was taught this
  • Who taught it to me
  • That they used the metaphor of a running track to indicate how black people were behind white people in their pre-mortal valiance
  • AND how bizarre I thought this teaching was
Although some people claim to have been taught such things in LDS seminary classes, I was never one of them.

Was such a thing believed by LDS Church members.  Unfortunately, yes.  Probably along these lines, I was in a fireside where Thurl Bailey spoke of how traumatized his white girlfriends parents were when they first met him and found out that he was black.  Eventually, however, Thurl's girlfriend's parents got over their prejudices, and they accepted him.  Thurl's then girlfriend is now Thurl's wife.

Here are some interesting excerpts from an interview with Apostle Legrande Richards shortly after the 1978 revelation granting black men the LDS priesthood:
"Some time ago, the Brethren decided that we should never say that [blacks were less valiant in pre-mortality]. We don't know just what the reason was [for blacks not holding the priesthood before 1978].  We don't want to get that as a doctrine. The Lord has never indicated that black skin came because of being less faithful."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...