Skip to main content

Who Questions or Leaves the LDS Church? Often People With Great Integrity. So Please Show Them Some Respect.

Although I am as comfortable with my testimony of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints and Christ's gospel as I am in my own skin, I realize that there are people who aren't. But whether someone leaves or questions their testimony of the LDS Church is not a litmus test for whether they are my friend or not.  I hope they always will be.

I recently read an article about those who question or leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.  I was especially struck by this poignant thought that the article contained:

"I worry that many younger Mormons are going through a very difficult and at times traumatic break from the Mormon church without resources and support that might have better informed their decision about staying or leaving or anything in between. "



It would be healthy for the Church to be more open about such things.  Leaving or questioning the LDS Church is almost never the end of the world for the one who leaves or who questions.  In reality, it's often the sign of a healthy mind and a healthy spirit.

So, why is a break with the Church so traumatic and "without resources" for many of those who leave?  It needn't be this way.

I'm not sure if members of the LDS Church:

(a) Don't know how they are supposed to relate with those who leave or contemplate leaving the Church?
(b) Think that leaving the Church is akin to sentencing one's self to eternal hellfire?
(c) Fear that empathizing with someone who questions or leaves is tantamount to questioning one's own witness of the truthfulness of Christ's gospel?

If it is "a", it would be helpful to have discussions in the LDS communities and in LDS General Conference about how to relate to those who perhaps seem to us to have rejected us in their questioning or rejection of LDS doctrines.

If it is "b", that's sad.  Ours is (or at least should be) a very inclusive Church, with a grander idea of salvation than any other that I'm aware of.  The atonement can fix just about anything, so we ought to ourselves show grace to someone who leaves or questions the Church by caring for them just as much as we ever did.

If it's "c", there's hope.  Everyone questions. Questioning is healthy.  Questioning is the key to spiritual, mental, and emotional growth.

In any case, this is apparently something we in the Church need to work on. If someone leaves, they are always welcome to come back.  And if they leave, they are no less a good person than when they were a member of the Church.  Our annoyance at the questioner or the leaver is almost always a greater impediment to their search for truth than their own questioning or leaving is.

Therefore, leaving or questioning the Church should not be seen as some sort of treason or other attack or sign of weakness.  Actually, it should usually be seen as a sign of integrity.

What do I mean by that? I mean that often people question because they feel it is important for them to honestly be able to say that they know.  And if they don't feel that they do INSIDE the Church, I don't see a problem with them searching OUTSIDE of it, as people with great integrity are wont to do.   In fact I celebrate such people expanding their search.  Regardless of whether that search  eventually brings them back to the Church or not.

Comments

  1. Great thoughts. It really is about loving people wherever they are at - without judgement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Frank, thank you - I really like this post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My experience has been that most LDS faithful are not nice since we left the church. I have watched my sweetheart be excluded from family reunions, called the devil, apostate, and evil by his own siblings. It is heartbreaking. And it certainly makes me glad not be like them - LDS. It shows me I made the right decision leaving. I am appalled at the small, petty, judgmental behavior I see from true blues. What poor examples...

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is typical for anyone leaving a religious or political group. Human nature I guess.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...