Skip to main content

Isaiah in the Book of Mormon, Including Deutero-Isaiah

I have been unable to find a quick reference for all of the passages from the Bible's book of Isaiah in the Book of Mormon.  So I put one together, below. I've also identified whether the Isaiah passages cited in the Book of Mormon come from the person known by scholars as "Deutero" (or Second) Isaiah.  Deutero-Isaiah comprises chapters 40-55 of Isaiah, and were likely written during the time of the Babylonian Captivity (587 BC to 538 BC).

You've perhaps noticed that the Babylonian Captivity happened after Lehi and his family left the land of Jerusalem.  Does that cause problems for the authenticity of the Book of Mormon?  I don't think so, and I'll explain that in a later post.


Book of Mormon Bible Book of Mormon Date Deutero-Isaiah?
1 Nephi 20 Isaiah 48 588-570 BC Yes
1 Nephi 21 Isaiah 49 588-570 BC Yes
1 Nephi 22:6 Isaiah 49:22 588-570 BC Yes
1 Nephi 22:8 Isaiah 49:22-23 588-570 BC Yes
1 Nephi 22:8 Isaiah 29:14 588-570 BC No
1 Nephi 22:10-11 Isaiah 52:10 588-570 BC Yes
2 Nephi 6:6-7 Isaiah 49:22-23 559-545 BC Yes
2 Nephi 6:15 Isaiah 29:6 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 6:16-8:25 Isaiah 49:24-52:2 559-545 BC Yes
2 Nephi 9:50-51 Isaiah 55:1-2 559-545 BC Yes
2 Nephi 12 thru 24 Isaiah 2 thru 14 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 25:17 Isaiah 11:11 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 25:17 Isaiah 29:14 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 26:25 Isaiah 55:1 559-545 BC Yes
2 Nephi 27:2-5 Isaiah 29:6-10 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 27:6-9 Isaiah 29:4, 11 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 27:15-19 Isaiah 29:11-12 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 27:25-35 Isaiah 29:13-24 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 28:9 Isaiah 29:15 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 28:14 Isaiah 29:13-24 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 28:16 Isaiah 29:21 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 28:30 Isaiah 28:10,13 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 28:32 Isaiah 29:12-13 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 29:12 Isaiah 29:14 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 29:12 Isaiah 11:11 559-545 BC No
2 Nephi 30:9, 12-15 Isaiah 11:4-9 559-545 BC No
Mosiah 12:21-24 Isaiah 52:7-10 148 BC Yes
Mosiah 14:1-12 Isaiah 53 148 BC Yes
Mosiah 15:10 Isaiah 53:10 148 BC Yes
Mosiah 15:14-18 Isaiah 52:7 148 BC Yes
Mosiah 15:29-31 Isaiah 52:8-10 148 BC Yes
3 Nephi 16:18-20 Isaiah 52:8-10 34 AD Yes
3 Nephi 20:32-35 Isaiah 52:8-10 34 AD Yes
3 Nephi 20:36-46 Isaiah 52:1-3, 6-7, 11-15 34 AD Yes
3 Nephi 21:8 Isaiah 52:15 34 AD Yes
3 Nephi 21:29 Isaiah 52:12 34 AD Yes
3 Nephi 22:1-17 Isaiah 54 34 AD Yes
Moroni 10:31 Isaiah 52:1-2, 54:2 421  AD Yes






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...