Skip to main content

"The Sins of Scripture": Reducing Violence in the Name of Religion

In his book The Sins of Scripture, John Shelby Spong points out that Christianity has interpreted the Bible in ways that have allowed Christians to do much violence--to women, to children, to gays, and to nations and peoples in general.  In this article, I will talk about two lost doctrines that have actually resulted in what are misinterpretations of scripture in the name of violence.
Scholars generally believe that what we have as the Old Testament didn't generally begin to be written down until about 800 BCE.  A lot of water ran under the bridge of humanity before that point, so it's likely that those 8th century scribes missed a lot of doctrine that was revealed to our original parents.

In many languages, the word for "Gentile" simply means "other".  It become for the Jews a derogatory term that connotes 'those poor benighted souls that aren't as blessed and as cool as us.'  That mindset, whether associated with the word "Gentile" or with many other negatively connoted words such as Jew, Kraut, Atheist, Fundamentalist, or the like, can't possibly be ways that a loving God would describe his children.

Yet it is precisely these kinds of exclusionary words and actions--in the name of religion--that have resulted in perhaps the majority of violence in earth's history.

So, in a way, John Shelby Spong is correct.
Hordes of religiously inclined people have used their interpretation of Biblical scripture to commit the sins of violence against a variety of people who they think are not as human as they are.

Two doctrines, largely lost, but reintroduced to the world by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, illustrate how what Spong calls an interpretation of scripture are actually gross misinterpretations of scripture.  When these two doctrines are correctly understood, the idea that scripture can be used to permit violence against others nearly vanishes.

1. All Men and Women are Created in the Image of God.  The doctrine of the Church of Jesus Christ is that when God, in the opening chapter of the bible, is said to have created man in the image of God, male and female, that this statement can be taken literally.  In other words, the image of God is not just male; it is also female.  The Church of Jesus Christ teaches the long forgotten truth that each of us is a child not only of a Heavenly Father, but also of a Heavenly Mother.  And being created in that dual, divine image, each of us has the potential (as Paul taught in the New Testament) to become like our Heavenly Parents--to become Gods ourselves.

2. The Doctrine of Pre-Mortality.  This is a doctrine that has been and is believed by many individuals who do not belong to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), but the only church to include the concept of part of its doctrine is the LDS Church. Some churches teach that Christ existed premortally, but none teach currently that each of us born to earth lived premortally as well.

Several people, having undergone near-death experiences, claim that their ability to comprehend and to know was greatly enhanced during the period when their spirits wandered from their bodies into the heavenly realms.

It is healthy for us to speculate, I think then, that we had such enhanced abilities in premortality, of comprehension and of association and of love.  It is entirely possible that we associated in friendships with others in premortality whose time to come to earth was hundreds of thousands of years different than our appointed times.  It is thus entirely possible that that "gentile" that crosses our path--whether they cut us off in traffic, make a terrible call as an official in a game that we are attending, or come from a distant land to go to war with us--was a dear friend of ours in our premortal state.

Knowing these doctrines, how can we even think to be violent with those who were our close associates in premortality and who, having been created in the divine image of Heavenly Parents, we would be strongly tempted to worship (C.S. Lewis)?

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...