Skip to main content

I Think There's a Good Reason for the King James Bible English in the Book of Mormon

Critics of the LDS Church think that phraseology from the King James Version of the BIble in the Book of Mormon indicates that it is a fraud. I disagree. Here's why.



If Smith were reading the Bible regularly before his 1820 encounter with Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ, and many angels, doesn't it stand to reason that Smith would be even more enthusiastic in reading the Bible thereafter than he was before? Our vocabulary is obviously shaped by the books we read. It is not hard to imagine that Smith's vocabulary would have been distinctly shaped by his reading of the Bible intensely for the 3 years between the "First Vision" and his becoming acquainted with Moroni in 1823. And that intensity could only have grown after Moroni quoted the Bible to him and told him that he was about to make clear the beginnings of the work that Christ told Smith in 1820 that he would be instrumental in helping to bring forth. I don't know about you, but by that point, I'd be taking my Bible with me to every meal, while I was walking into town, while I was resting in between clearing land for my father's farm, and a lot of other places I can think of.

The King James Bible was the most popular edition in the day, and I think it's been evidenced that the Smith family had at least one copy(?) of the KJV. In the 9 years or so between Smith's first encounter with the divine and when the Book of Mormon translation began, I can imagine that Smith had thoroughly incorporated KJV vocabulary into his everyday manner of speech (not to mention that he had probably been able to memorize great swathes of it in preparation for the mission that Christ and Moroni told him he was being assigned).

We also have significant evidence that Christ, the Father, and Moroni were only a very few of the divine messengers that Smith entertained during that time period.

This sheds light on a very likely reason that the Book of Mormon is peppered with KJV phraseology.

Comments

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.
2 comments
Read more

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...
66 comments
Read more

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...
67 comments
Read more