Skip to main content

Why Does the Book of Mosiah Begin Differently than All the Others?

Three Distinct Patterns of Beginning Books of the Book of Mormon


With few exceptions, depending on whether the Book of Mormon writer is giving his own account or


giving an abridgement of an existing account, the book will begin with one of two patterns.


  • Personal Account: The author opens the book by introducing himself.

  • Abridgement: The book begins by stating the time period in which the account begins.


The exceptions are Mosiah and Ether. But Ether is really just a variation of Moroni giving his personal account.  So the only odd-ball beginning of a book in the Book of Mormon is Mosiah. Why is Mosiah unique?  The answer is below.


Personal Account


All of the personal accounts begin with the name of the author.


  • “I Nephi having been born of goodly parents...” (1 Nephi)

  • “...After I, Nephi, had made an end of teaching my brethren...” (2 Nephi)

  • “...Nephi gave me, Jacob, a commandment concerning the small plates...” (Jacob)

  • “...I, Enos, knowing my father to be a just man...” (Enos)

  • “Now, behold, I, Jarom, write a few words...” (Jarom)

  • “...I, Omni, being commanded by my father, Jarom...” (Omni)

  • “And now I, Mormon, being about to deliver up the record [to] my son Moroni...” (Words of Mormon)

  • “And now I, Mormon, make a record of the things which I have seen and heard...” (Mormon)

  • “Now I, Moroni, after having made an end of abridging the account of the people of Jared...” (Moroni)


Abridgement


All of the abridgements except for that of Ether begin with identifying a time period in which the account begins.


  • “...in the first year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi...” (Alma)

  • “...in the commencement of the fortieth year of the reign of the judges...” (Helaman)

  • “...the ninety and first year had passed away, and it was six hundred years from the time that Lehi left Jerusalem...” (3 Nephi)

  • “...the thirty and fourth year had passed away...” (4 Nephi)


The Exceptions


Moroni's abridgement of Ether starts off as an account of who is doing the abridging.


  • “And now I, Moroni, proceed to give an account of those ancient inhabitants who were destroyed...”  (Ether)


But then there's the really weird beginning--Mosiah.

  • “And now there was no more convention in all the land of Zarahemla...” (Mosiah)


What Happened to Mosiah?


It’s not clear why Mosiah begins suddenly out of nowhere.  But here’s a pretty good theory.  The 116 pages of manuscript that were lost by Martin Harris contained the first two chapters of Mosiah. In the original manuscript of the Book of Mormon, Oliver Cowdery began what we now have as chapter 1 of Mosiah with the heading called “Chapter 3”.  When the printer’s manuscript was being prepared, Cowdery changed “Chapter 3” to “Chapter 1”.  Here’s a link to more of a discussion on that.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...