Skip to main content

Why Morality is Critical--The Children


It is becoming increasingly common to claim that morality is not important. What is worse, some claim that religion is not important to the maintenance of morality. This view is at best a risky proposition, and at worst a recipe for disaster. Amorality is taunting our society more and more as time goes by.

Yesterday my son called his mother and said he was feeling sick and needed to come home from school early. It turns out that a classmate had been hitting him in the stomach. I told my wife, "I'm glad that our son is a good kid and didn't strike back. But find out who his father is, and I will visit with his father, and tell him 'if it happens again, I'm coming after you!'

My wife said, no one knows who the father is. The school child is a former drug baby, who is being raised by his grandparents.

That makes 6 sets of grandparents that I know that either are or have recently been raising their grandchildren. This is why morality is critical. Because our immorality can hardly affect only ourselves. It has a dramatic effect on our children.

In his recent book The God Delusion, Richard Dawkins opined that religion is unnecessary to a civilized society--that people will choose to be moral without religion to remind them. George Washington was of a different mind. He said:

Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness...

And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

I cast my lot with George Washington. Amorality and immorality are at the core of most of the problems we have in this world.

Why is drug use immoral? Because it creates fatherless classroom bullies.

Why is illegal immigration immoral? Because it contributes to an overall sense that respect for the law is not needed.

Why is homosexual fornication immoral? Because it creates a sense of self-centeredness that contributes to societal breakdown. Why are heterosexual fornication and adultery immoral? For the same reason--AND because they create either a child who is not wanted or a child who, because he or she is not wanted, is put to an untimely death by his or her parents.

I am surprised sometimes that far more lawless acts don't occur in America, as they do in some other countries. What's the difference? Morality engendered by religion is a far greater part of American than many other cultures. Do murderers go to church on Sunday? Not usually. How about adulterers? Some of them do, but not most. How about drug pushers? No. A good indicator of a nation's people's respect for each other is their level of religious worship.

Mr. Washington, you are right. Mr. Dawkins, you are wrong. American society functions well because most people are religious, because religion encourages them to act morally toward their fellow men, from not killing them to taking their turn at the stop sign or the traffic light.

In a nutshell, everyone has a right to demand that everyone else be moral, because we should be tired of their mistakes either being killed because they are unwanted, or hitting our kids in the stomach and having to be baby-tended by their grandparents. Let's start standing up for a part of society that is critical, and demand of everyone, including ourselves, that we be moral.

Comments

  1. The abolition of religion is one of the first goals of communism. Government is to replace religion. Morality is only what is good for the government not what God wants.

    Very good post and insights.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Despite the many good things accomplished by religious societies and people, there are many examples (both historical and current) of tyranny and immorality in the name of religion. We are confronted daily with atrocities committed in the name of religious ideology.

    Of course, the finest examples of immorality and atrocities during the 20th Century come from godless ideologies that purported to be based in reason and enlightenment. Still, my atheist and agnostic friends will be quick to point out many examples of religion-free moral activity.

    So there are examples of good and evil on both sides of the coin. As Travis notes, in many ways, these two sides are in direct competition with each other.

    BYU professor Daniel Peterson argues here that religion is essential to morality. He claims that any morality held by atheists must necessarily be weakly borrowed from religion. Atheists disagree. I posted about this issue myself in November 2005.

    I'm simply saying that there are differing viewpoints on this matter, although, my personal views agree with yours.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Travis,

    Ironically this is the real problem that Islam has with America--that we are foisting our immorality on the rest of the world.

    Scott,

    Daniel Peterson had some excellent things to say on the subject. I'm just starting to read "The Enemy at Home" by Dinesh D'Souza, after which I'm sure I'll have some more to blog about morality!!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

What's Your Reaction to California's Decision on Same-Sex Marriage?

Yesterday a "Republican-dominated" California Supreme Court struck down state laws against same-sex marriages. The LDS Church issued a press release, calling the decision "unfortunate". I agree, but not for reasons you might think. Did the California Court make the right decision? Update 5/17/2008 : California decision does not affect prohibitions against polygamy and marriage of close relatives. Why not? Government should not sanction same-sex marriages for the same reason that it should not sanction heterosexual adultery--such activities tend to be destructive to the family as the fundamental unit of society. Before you get too far into reading into my words, let me echo and agree with something that Madeleine Albright wrote in her recent book, The Mighty & The Almighty (one of the better books that I have read in a long time): I oppose discrimination against gays and lesbians and am convinced that heterosexual adultery is a greater danger to the institu...