Skip to main content

Imperialist Newt Gingrich Fabricates Another Ticking Time Bomb Scenario

Beginning in late 2008, the RAND corporation began lobbying for war in an effort to jump-start the moribund American economy. In an apparent effort to provide more fodder for that cannon, globalist extraordinaire Newt Gingrich warned recently that our next ticking time bomb scenario is likely to happen very soon. If we don't attack Iran and North Korea soon, Gingrich warns, the American economy will be utterly destroyed by the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) of enemy nuclear weapons.

Share/Save/Bookmark
"War is good for the economy." Some of my co-workers agreed with that statement on a recent walk to the local Chevron for a

Unfortunately, the likelihood of Americans being suckered into a frenzy by Newt's latest ticking time bomb scenario is immensely greater than the probability that Newt's apocalypse would ever happen anywhere in the universe.

soda pop.

Rubbish, I said. At best, it only appears to be good for the economy. War, even of a defensive nature, is never good for the economy.War of the kind America has been starting lately is only good for those who have planned in advance how to take advantage of it.

You may not be surprised to hear, then, that a class of snobbish neoconservative elitists have been proposing just such an new war eventuality as a means of getting the United States out of its economic doldrums.
...the RAND Corporation recently presented a shocking proposal to the Pentagon in which it lobbied for a war to be started with a major foreign power in an attempt to stimulate the American economy and prevent a recession.

...RAND suggested that the $700 billion dollars that has been earmarked to bailout Wall Street and failing banks instead be used to finance a new war which would in turn re-invigorate the flagging stock markets.

China’s biggest media outlet, Sohu.com, speculated that the target of the new war would probably be China or Russia, but that it could also be Iran...
The effort to embroil the United States in a

Mr. Gingrich should have been thoroughly discredited by now. What is this man still doing around? Why don't we each just shut him up once and for all with an electromagnetic pulse from our television remote control?

third foreign conflict (perhaps fourth, if Pakistan continues to aim for al Qaeda but bomb itself in the foot) seems to have flagged--until recently. That's where Newt Gingrich has come to the rescue of Establishment neoconservatives.

In the past month, Gingrich spoke apocalyptically in Washington to a group in need of no such suggestions; the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) can foment itself into an apocalyptic lather without Gingrich's help. Yet, here's what Gingrich tantalized them with anyway:
Gingrich heartily recommended a disturbing apocalyptic thriller currently on The New York Times' best-seller list. Written by William Forstchen, One Second After tells the story of what happens to a college town after the lights go out. Not just the lights, actually, but electrical devices of all kinds. Phones go dead, computers fritz, cars won't start. That this is a more than an inconvenience quickly becomes apparent: Patients die in powerless hospitals, and frozen food begins to rot. Word spreads that airliners have simply dropped from sky, including Air Force One. (The president is dead.) Squirrel meat is traded for ammunition as Mexico reclaims Texas, China occupies the West coast, and cannibalistic mobs rampage everywhere else.
Who has such a capability of destroying American

War, even of a defensive nature, is never good for the economy. War of the kind America has been starting lately is only good for those who have figured out in advance a way of taking advantage of it.

electrical devices of all kinds? Well...Iran and North Korea, of course! So we must attack them, Newt bellows. Gingrich's scenario is possible, but like the previous highly unlikely ticking-time-bomb scenarios that Gingrich, Dick Cheney, and Kiefer Sutherland have postulated, this one is also far from realistic. But that doesn't matter--we have an economy to save!

Gingrich is part of, by the way, this same group of Keystone Cops who were completely confident that Saddam Hussein was on the verge of raining down weapons of mass destruction on the American Homeland. Inconveniently, Saddam's "mountains" of nuclear and chemical weapons didn't turn out even to be "molehills", yet Gingrich and his ilk seem hell-bent on--and potentially successful at--sucking America into another phony war. Forget the probability, though. Gingrich hypnosis suggests to our minds that even the remotest of possibility is enough to warrant further expansion of the American empire.
"It's based on fact, it is accurate, and it's horrifying, and we have zero national strategy to respond to it today," Gingrich said. He laid out a vision in which three small nuclear weapons detonated at the right altitude would eliminate all electricity production in the United States. Which is why, he concluded, "I favor taking out Iranian and North Korean missiles on their sites. "
Far too many Americans were stupid enough to believe that the 1994 Newt Republican Contract with America was actually meant for middle-class America. As well,

Gingrich's scenario is possible, but like the previous highly unlikely ticking-time-bomb scenarios that Gingrich, Dick Cheney, and Kiefer Sutherland have postulated, this one is also far from realistic. But that doesn't matter--we have an economy to save!

far too many Americans were suckered by Newt Republicans into believing that we were on Saddam's short list of becoming nuclear, chemical, and biological holocaust victims.

We've already been fooled twice by Newt Gingrich and his Establishment wolf crowd beguilingly beclothed as conservative sheep.

In the past month, Gingrich spoke apocalyptically in Washington to a group in need of no such suggestions; the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) can foment itself into an apocalyptic lather without Gingrich's help.

Could it happen again? Unfortunately, the likelihood that Americans will allow themselves to be worked into a frenzy by Newt's latest ticking time bomb scenario is immensely greater than the probability that Newt's apocalypse would ever happen anywhere in the universe.

He should have been thoroughly discredited by now. What is this man still doing around? Why don't we each just shut him up once and for all with an electromagnetic pulse from our television remote control?

Related Articles:
Gingrich Ignores the Real EMP Threat



Comments

  1. Ok, everyone who believes this please stand on your head.

    This guy gets his information from..... wait for it.... "reports out of top Chinese mainstream news outlets..."

    Hahahahahaha

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why would anyone wish to destroy our economy when it seems we have elected "representatives" who are quite capable of doing it themselves?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

Hey, Senator Buttars: "Happy Holidays!!"

Utah Senator Chris Buttars may be a well-meaning individual, but his actions often don't come out that way. His latest lament, with accompanying legislation that businesses use the phrase "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", is at least the third case in point that I am aware of. First, we were entertained by the faux pas made by the Senator in the 2008 Utah Legislative session, when referring to an In reality, America has a Judeo -Christian heritage, so maybe Senator Buttars should change his legislation to "encourage" businesses to advertise with " Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas"...? analogy of a human baby, of declaring that " this baby is black ". Then there was the attempt to help a friend develop his property in Mapleton, Utah, by using the force if his legislative office . Let's see if we can top that... Who cares that businesses hock their Christmas wares by using the term "Happy Holidays"? I