Skip to main content

Sanctions Against Iran Will Work as Poorly as Sanctions Against Iraq


Citizens of authoritarian regimes already depend heavily on government for the many of the basics of life. That's why sanctions against the authoritarian regimes don't hurt the regimes themselves--they only decimate the already subjected peoples. Iraq is but one great example of this phenomenon. Recently passed and continuing sanctions against Iran are a mistake that is becoming larger and larger.


Share/Save/Bookmark
Yesterday, the United Nations established yet additional economic sanctions on Iran.
The United Nations Security Council voted Wednesday to impose new sanctions on Iran to try to force it to suspend its nuclear program.


The new sanctions include cargo inspections, new controls on Iranian banks ... restrictions on the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a new U.N. panel of experts to help monitor and enforce sanctions, and asset freezes on 40 entities and an individual.

Besides the fact that we have no business caring whether Iran develops nuclear capabilities, history shows that sanctions do not work for their publicized purposes.


Ask the Iraqi people.
When Paul Bremer arrived in Iraq to take the lead of the rebuilding effort, he was shocked by the economic situation there.  Huh? What rock did he crawl out from under?  Had he never heard of the years of sanctions that had been levied against Saddam Hussein? In 2006, Christopher Hayes wrote
The reason Iraq’s economy was “run down” and its infrastructure decimated has more than a little to do with a massive American bombing campaign during the first Gulf War, followed by 13 years of the most comprehensive sanctions in the history of the United Nations. Bremer’s “surprise” at Iraq’s devastation is like a Union general arriving in Atlanta after Sherman and expressing shock that the place had been torched.

Unfortunately, the sanctions had little effect on Saddam Hussein.  He still enjoyed his lavish palaces and all the other accouterments of the high life.  It was the Iraqi people who suffered mightily.

In his book, Web of Deceit, Barry Lando wrote that
The most lethal weapons of mass destruction to hit the people of Iraq were the sanctions imposed by the U.N. security council on August 6, 1990. They cut off all exports and imports between Iraq and the rest of the world; that meant everything--from food and electric generators, to vaccines and hospital equipment.  Since Iraq imported 70 percent of its food, the sanctions had an immediate and catastrophic impact on the country.

Two U.N. administrators who oversaw humanitarian relief in Iraq during that period consider the sanctions to have been a crime against humanity, as massive as any of the crimes committed by Saddam Hussein.

Web of Deceit: The History of Western Complicity in Iraq, from Churchill to Kennedy to George W. Bush, p. 185

And now we're doing it to the Iranian people under the guise of punishing their government. Rather than economic sanctions, it would be better to just leave Iran alone.  It would be best, however, to do the exact opposite of what we've been doing. Economic sanctions do not have their intended consequences--at least the ones that are stated publicly.

If we could show the Iranian people the caring side of America, instead of our monster face, crazies like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the mullahs would be out of power much sooner. The vice grip of tighter and tighter sanctions will make such a rapprochement eventually impossible without military intervention.

After having read George Orwell's 1984, though, it could be that more war is just what the American Establishment is looking for.

Related:

NPR: Iran Sanctions Play into the Hands of the Iranian Government

Comments

  1. If you actually read the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran has every right to enrich uranium as they are doing. They are not in violation of international law. Israel, on the other hand, is in flagrant violation of multiple international laws and continues to commit one violation after another including the recent attack of an unarmed vessel on the high seas that was attempting to break Israel's illegal blockade of illegally occupied Gaza. When the UN gets out from under US State Department control and starts treating nations equally, we might get somewhere.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

Hey, Senator Buttars: "Happy Holidays!!"

Utah Senator Chris Buttars may be a well-meaning individual, but his actions often don't come out that way. His latest lament, with accompanying legislation that businesses use the phrase "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", is at least the third case in point that I am aware of. First, we were entertained by the faux pas made by the Senator in the 2008 Utah Legislative session, when referring to an In reality, America has a Judeo -Christian heritage, so maybe Senator Buttars should change his legislation to "encourage" businesses to advertise with " Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas"...? analogy of a human baby, of declaring that " this baby is black ". Then there was the attempt to help a friend develop his property in Mapleton, Utah, by using the force if his legislative office . Let's see if we can top that... Who cares that businesses hock their Christmas wares by using the term "Happy Holidays"? I