Skip to main content

Clothed In and Covered By the Grace of Christ

Those who serve temples of God put on white clothing, signifying purity. The only way each of us can become pure is through regularly availing ourselves of the grace of the Atonement of Jesus Christ. Thus, that white clothing also reminds us how Christ covers--or forgives--our sins.

Elder John A Widtsoe, and apostle in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, taught that
“In [God's] temples all are dressed alike in white...the symbol of purity...symboliz[ing] that before God our Father in heaven, all men are equal. The...learned and the unlearned, the prince and the pauper sit side by side in the temple and are of equal importance..before the Lord God, the Father of their spirits. It is spiritual fitness and understanding that one receives in the temple. " 
Have you ever been to a restaurant, and the person you were with said, at the end of the meal, "Don't worry--I've got it covered."?  Wasn't it a good feeling that someone was willing to pay the price of the meal for you?  In a much more profound way, we can rest in the comfort of knowing that, if we want him to, Christ's grace, through his atoning sacrifice, has got our past sins covered as well, and we don't have to worry about them anymore.

In Hebrew, the word for atonement is "kaphar", which means “to cover” or “to forgive.” Thus, as we serve in the temple, we are reminded by the symbolic clothing that we wear that we are literally covered and made whole by the grace of Christ.

The importance of sacred clothing was taught to our first parents.  Some time after Adam and Eve left the garden of Eden, they learned from an angel that the animal sacrifice they had been commanded to perform was "in the similitude of the sacrifice of the Only Begotten [Jesus Christ] of the Father" (Pearl of Great Price, Moses chapter 5 verse 7). From these animals, coats of skins were made as a covering for our first parents. The angel taught them that the purpose of their sacrifice, as well as the significance of their clothing, was to point them forward to the time when Jesus Christ would come to earth to atone for their--and our--sins.
Wherefore, thou shalt do all that thou doest in the aname of the Son, and thou shalt brepent and ccall upon God in the name of the Son forevermore.
In the same way, when we enter the temple, exchanging our "street clothes" for clothes of white, we are reminded not only that we are all children of God, but also that we can become pure because our sins are "covered" or forgiven by the grace of Jesus Christ.  What a wonderful reason to dedicate our lives to following his matchless example.

Comments

  1. I've often thought of the temple garment as a symbol of the kaphar or covenant of the atonement since it represents the identity of Christ (take his name upon us) being worn by us. The animals that gave their skin had to die to do so, just like Christ had to die to cover us with his identity. the way I describe the garment to non Mormons is as a setting around the finger. that really is its practical function for me.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...