Skip to main content

As Assad Regime Totters, Obama Can't Resist Embroiling the US

The UN envoy to Syria is asking Bashar al Assad to step down. A Russian deputy foreign minister said that Assad's control over Syria is weakening. So what does the Obama Administration do? It riles up the situation by sending US troops into the fray.

It's beyond unfortunate that 40,000 Syrians have been killed in the current civil war there. It does, however, seem to be coming to a close. So perhaps that's why the Obama administration chose today to embroil itself in the situation.

Over the past few days, signs are accumulating that Syrian dictator Bashar al Assad is losing his control over the country, including an admission of Assad's faltering by a Russian minister.
Mikhail Bogdanov, the Russian deputy foreign minister...who serves as Russia’s envoy to the Middle East, acknowledged that Syria’s rebels were on course to overthrow the president as they captured more and more of the country. “The tendency is for the regime and the government in Syria to lose more and more control, and more and more territory. Unfortunately, the victory of the Syrian opposition cannot be excluded,” he told a Kremlin advisory body.
Russia's government is now backtracking Bogdanov's comments just a bit, in the traditional fraudulent way the Russian government does these kinds of things:
Russia has denied that its deputy foreign minister said that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad was losing control of his country.
It's hard to deny something that was clearly said, but the Russian government doesn't let that stop them from trying.

As the Syrian civil war winds down, the best approach from the outside is to watch the implosion of the Syrian dictatorship.  Instead, however, as of today the Obama Administration is giving the Assad regime an incentive to retrench.
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta signed an official deployment order on Friday to send 400 American military personnel and two Patriot air defense batteries to Turkey as cross-border tensions with Syria intensify.
From my perspective, that is a very poor move.  American involvement in the affairs of other nations over the last 10 years has given America a black eye in the eyes of the rest of the world.  It's a great way to put ourselves in position to find a pretext to further involved ourselves where we should not be. Come to think of it, it's almost as though the United States is on the side of Bashar al Assad and against the freedom of the Syrian people.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

Hey, Senator Buttars: "Happy Holidays!!"

Utah Senator Chris Buttars may be a well-meaning individual, but his actions often don't come out that way. His latest lament, with accompanying legislation that businesses use the phrase "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", is at least the third case in point that I am aware of. First, we were entertained by the faux pas made by the Senator in the 2008 Utah Legislative session, when referring to an In reality, America has a Judeo -Christian heritage, so maybe Senator Buttars should change his legislation to "encourage" businesses to advertise with " Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas"...? analogy of a human baby, of declaring that " this baby is black ". Then there was the attempt to help a friend develop his property in Mapleton, Utah, by using the force if his legislative office . Let's see if we can top that... Who cares that businesses hock their Christmas wares by using the term "Happy Holidays"? I