Skip to main content

It's a Calling from the Lord, So I Should Accept It, Right? Not So Fast...

I recently had yet another conversation with yet another friend about
the topic of accepting callings from LDS Church leaders.

My friend told me that he didn't think he should question the calling his Church leader gave him because, after all, it's the leader's responsibility to receive revelation regarding such callings, isn't it?

This is a very common mistake made by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to think that only Church leaders issuing callings should receive revelation about who should serve in those callings.

"Don't you think you should also receive revelation as to whether the calling is right for you?" I asked my friend.

"Well, I guess so", came the response.

I explained to him an experience I had while serving in an LDS bishopric a few years ago.  All the members of the bishopric felt very strongly the impression to call a certain sister in the ward to be our Primary president. The call was made, and the Bishop visited with the sister. During the interview, the sister explained some physical problems she had been having recently, which the bishop was completely unaware of. These ailments made it very clear that now was not the right time for her to serve as primary president.

We learned from that experience that Church leaders very often do receive revelation as to whom to call to certain callings, but sometimes for reasons that we least expect. Sometimes inspiration to issue a calling may actually be inspiration that leads to finding out something important about a member of the ward that may have otherwise gone unknown. Needless to say, after that doubly revelatory experience, the call to serve as Primary president was issued to someone else.

Members of the Church usually understand their current situation and their personal limitations better than anyone else. Therefore, each member is entitled to know whether or not those limitations would make it too difficult for her or him to serve in a calling issued by a Church leader.  Because we received revelation to ask that sister to accept a calling, the bishop received further revelatory insights on how to show the caring and compassion that someone in his ward needed.

Next time a calling is issued to you, don't feel compelled to take it.  Instead, take some time as necessary to find out for yourself whether the Lord wants you to take that calling.  Not only can Church leaders receive revelation about callings, so can you.

 

Comments

  1. I completely agree. Thanks for posting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was asked to serve in a calling a long time ago. When the call was issued to me, I did not feel good about it! I felt that no prayers had gone up to the Lord as to whether I should serve in that capacity. Although I did accept the calling, it turned out not to be a successful one...not for me, but for those I was asked to serve. I had had this same calling twice before in less than 4 years and felt that I was being asked just because nobody else wanted it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doesn't that really mean that the "inspiration" the whole bishopric felt was then, in fact, something else?

    This raises a larger issue for Mormons. How often are we interpreting our impressions of people based on other factors, or our own emotions as inspiration or revelation?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous: Great example. Thanks for sharing!

    Spencer: If you're referring to the example I gave in the blog post, no. It was inspiration to talk to a person who needed help.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great observation: "Church leaders very often do receive revelation as to whom to call to certain callings, but sometimes for reasons that we least expect."

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...