Skip to main content

Who Questions or Leaves the LDS Church? Often People With Great Integrity. So Please Show Them Some Respect.

Although I am as comfortable with my testimony of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints and Christ's gospel as I am in my own skin, I realize that there are people who aren't. But whether someone leaves or questions their testimony of the LDS Church is not a litmus test for whether they are my friend or not.  I hope they always will be.

I recently read an article about those who question or leave the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.  I was especially struck by this poignant thought that the article contained:

"I worry that many younger Mormons are going through a very difficult and at times traumatic break from the Mormon church without resources and support that might have better informed their decision about staying or leaving or anything in between. "



It would be healthy for the Church to be more open about such things.  Leaving or questioning the LDS Church is almost never the end of the world for the one who leaves or who questions.  In reality, it's often the sign of a healthy mind and a healthy spirit.

So, why is a break with the Church so traumatic and "without resources" for many of those who leave?  It needn't be this way.

I'm not sure if members of the LDS Church:

(a) Don't know how they are supposed to relate with those who leave or contemplate leaving the Church?
(b) Think that leaving the Church is akin to sentencing one's self to eternal hellfire?
(c) Fear that empathizing with someone who questions or leaves is tantamount to questioning one's own witness of the truthfulness of Christ's gospel?

If it is "a", it would be helpful to have discussions in the LDS communities and in LDS General Conference about how to relate to those who perhaps seem to us to have rejected us in their questioning or rejection of LDS doctrines.

If it is "b", that's sad.  Ours is (or at least should be) a very inclusive Church, with a grander idea of salvation than any other that I'm aware of.  The atonement can fix just about anything, so we ought to ourselves show grace to someone who leaves or questions the Church by caring for them just as much as we ever did.

If it's "c", there's hope.  Everyone questions. Questioning is healthy.  Questioning is the key to spiritual, mental, and emotional growth.

In any case, this is apparently something we in the Church need to work on. If someone leaves, they are always welcome to come back.  And if they leave, they are no less a good person than when they were a member of the Church.  Our annoyance at the questioner or the leaver is almost always a greater impediment to their search for truth than their own questioning or leaving is.

Therefore, leaving or questioning the Church should not be seen as some sort of treason or other attack or sign of weakness.  Actually, it should usually be seen as a sign of integrity.

What do I mean by that? I mean that often people question because they feel it is important for them to honestly be able to say that they know.  And if they don't feel that they do INSIDE the Church, I don't see a problem with them searching OUTSIDE of it, as people with great integrity are wont to do.   In fact I celebrate such people expanding their search.  Regardless of whether that search  eventually brings them back to the Church or not.

Comments

  1. Great thoughts. It really is about loving people wherever they are at - without judgement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Frank, thank you - I really like this post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My experience has been that most LDS faithful are not nice since we left the church. I have watched my sweetheart be excluded from family reunions, called the devil, apostate, and evil by his own siblings. It is heartbreaking. And it certainly makes me glad not be like them - LDS. It shows me I made the right decision leaving. I am appalled at the small, petty, judgmental behavior I see from true blues. What poor examples...

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is typical for anyone leaving a religious or political group. Human nature I guess.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

Hey, Senator Buttars: "Happy Holidays!!"

Utah Senator Chris Buttars may be a well-meaning individual, but his actions often don't come out that way. His latest lament, with accompanying legislation that businesses use the phrase "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", is at least the third case in point that I am aware of. First, we were entertained by the faux pas made by the Senator in the 2008 Utah Legislative session, when referring to an In reality, America has a Judeo -Christian heritage, so maybe Senator Buttars should change his legislation to "encourage" businesses to advertise with " Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas"...? analogy of a human baby, of declaring that " this baby is black ". Then there was the attempt to help a friend develop his property in Mapleton, Utah, by using the force if his legislative office . Let's see if we can top that... Who cares that businesses hock their Christmas wares by using the term "Happy Holidays"? I