Skip to main content

The Book of Abraham: An Insightful Look on Whether it is Authentic and How it May Have Come Forth

Is the Book of Abraham true?  Yes, I think so.  But this volume of LDS scripture very likely didn't come about in quite the way that you were taught in seminary or Sunday school.

I've recently come across a great podcast called Mormon Sunday School by Jared Anderson. In one of his episodes, Jared and his panel of guests have some very insightful looks at the value of the Book of Abraham and how it came to be.  The podcast can be found here.  My interpretive notes and quotes from the podcast are included in this blog article.

Note: Jared and his guest panelists come at this topic from a believing perspective.  They all agree that the Book of Abraham is authentic and teaches profound eternal truths. For some who may not be sure that they can accept the traditional story of how Joseph Smith brought about the Book of Abraham, the 3-hour podcast discussion will be a treat!

2:45:50 - David Bokovoy: Joseph Smith was not a translator in the traditional sense.  He was a seer, a visionary who makes the hidden things known to the world. Carl Sandberg in "Knowing Brother Joseph Again" states that Joseph Smith never did document-to-document translation, except in a Hebrew class that he took from Joshua Seixas.

2:47:35 - Jared Anderson: So many stumble over the coming forth of the Book of Abraham for reasons that are unnecessary.  Joseph Smith is an authentic prophet.

2:49:00 - Maxine Hanks: It doesn't matter that the Book of Abraham may not have been written by Abraham and that Joseph Smith may not have translated from papyri that he received from Michael Chandler.  Our testimonies of the Book of Abraham should be based on the wonderful eternal truths that it teaches us.

2:50:00 - Maxine Hanks: As opposed to "translating", Joseph Smith regularly referred to himself as "translating by the gift and power of God". He claims to have experienced a revelatory process during each episode of his translations. This conforms to ancient visionary tradition.

2:51:00 - Maxine Hanks: Members were probably taught a much more simplistic view of Joseph Smith's translations, but the more complex reality is actually a much deeper and more satisfying realization than that Joseph Smith simply looked at ancient documents and translated them in a scholarly way. "Mormonism is based on vision. You go within, and access a spiritual dimension that is beyond the mortal/physical. Lots of Mormons have visionary and revelatory experiences. It is far more profound and demanding and awe-inspiring to have a vision, to have an encounter with the divine, than sitting down and translating Hebrew or Egyptian characters in a scholarly way.  Not to discount the inspiration and bliss that comes from scholarship and [traditional] translation, but it is a far more profound exercise to enter into the doorway of your own soul and encounter God and angels and try to verbalize that visionary experience."

2:53:25 - Hanks: Joseph Smith often contrasted his revelatory experiences with what the "learned men"--who could not grasp his methods--were doing.
. . .

April 26, 2015: I've only just begun to put down my notes regarding the podcast.  Please check back from time to time to see more and more of my observations

Comments

  1. Thank you for the comments regarding the podcast. At Mormon Sunday School, we try to have constructive discussion regarding difficult issues.

    If anyone is interested in participating in the Facebook Group, we look forward to your participation: https://www.facebook.com/groups/360411960680762/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

Hey, Senator Buttars: "Happy Holidays!!"

Utah Senator Chris Buttars may be a well-meaning individual, but his actions often don't come out that way. His latest lament, with accompanying legislation that businesses use the phrase "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", is at least the third case in point that I am aware of. First, we were entertained by the faux pas made by the Senator in the 2008 Utah Legislative session, when referring to an In reality, America has a Judeo -Christian heritage, so maybe Senator Buttars should change his legislation to "encourage" businesses to advertise with " Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas"...? analogy of a human baby, of declaring that " this baby is black ". Then there was the attempt to help a friend develop his property in Mapleton, Utah, by using the force if his legislative office . Let's see if we can top that... Who cares that businesses hock their Christmas wares by using the term "Happy Holidays"? I