Skip to main content

The Book of Abraham: An Insightful Look on Whether it is Authentic and How it May Have Come Forth

Is the Book of Abraham true?  Yes, I think so.  But this volume of LDS scripture very likely didn't come about in quite the way that you were taught in seminary or Sunday school.

I've recently come across a great podcast called Mormon Sunday School by Jared Anderson. In one of his episodes, Jared and his panel of guests have some very insightful looks at the value of the Book of Abraham and how it came to be.  The podcast can be found here.  My interpretive notes and quotes from the podcast are included in this blog article.

Note: Jared and his guest panelists come at this topic from a believing perspective.  They all agree that the Book of Abraham is authentic and teaches profound eternal truths. For some who may not be sure that they can accept the traditional story of how Joseph Smith brought about the Book of Abraham, the 3-hour podcast discussion will be a treat!

2:45:50 - David Bokovoy: Joseph Smith was not a translator in the traditional sense.  He was a seer, a visionary who makes the hidden things known to the world. Carl Sandberg in "Knowing Brother Joseph Again" states that Joseph Smith never did document-to-document translation, except in a Hebrew class that he took from Joshua Seixas.

2:47:35 - Jared Anderson: So many stumble over the coming forth of the Book of Abraham for reasons that are unnecessary.  Joseph Smith is an authentic prophet.

2:49:00 - Maxine Hanks: It doesn't matter that the Book of Abraham may not have been written by Abraham and that Joseph Smith may not have translated from papyri that he received from Michael Chandler.  Our testimonies of the Book of Abraham should be based on the wonderful eternal truths that it teaches us.

2:50:00 - Maxine Hanks: As opposed to "translating", Joseph Smith regularly referred to himself as "translating by the gift and power of God". He claims to have experienced a revelatory process during each episode of his translations. This conforms to ancient visionary tradition.

2:51:00 - Maxine Hanks: Members were probably taught a much more simplistic view of Joseph Smith's translations, but the more complex reality is actually a much deeper and more satisfying realization than that Joseph Smith simply looked at ancient documents and translated them in a scholarly way. "Mormonism is based on vision. You go within, and access a spiritual dimension that is beyond the mortal/physical. Lots of Mormons have visionary and revelatory experiences. It is far more profound and demanding and awe-inspiring to have a vision, to have an encounter with the divine, than sitting down and translating Hebrew or Egyptian characters in a scholarly way.  Not to discount the inspiration and bliss that comes from scholarship and [traditional] translation, but it is a far more profound exercise to enter into the doorway of your own soul and encounter God and angels and try to verbalize that visionary experience."

2:53:25 - Hanks: Joseph Smith often contrasted his revelatory experiences with what the "learned men"--who could not grasp his methods--were doing.
. . .

April 26, 2015: I've only just begun to put down my notes regarding the podcast.  Please check back from time to time to see more and more of my observations

Comments

  1. Unknown8/06/2015 08:53:00 AM

    Thank you for the comments regarding the podcast. At Mormon Sunday School, we try to have constructive discussion regarding difficult issues.

    If anyone is interested in participating in the Facebook Group, we look forward to your participation: https://www.facebook.com/groups/360411960680762/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...
66 comments
Read more

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...
52 comments
Read more

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...
50 comments
Read more