Skip to main content

Why Does the Book of Mosiah Begin Differently than All the Others?

Three Distinct Patterns of Beginning Books of the Book of Mormon


With few exceptions, depending on whether the Book of Mormon writer is giving his own account or


giving an abridgement of an existing account, the book will begin with one of two patterns.


  • Personal Account: The author opens the book by introducing himself.

  • Abridgement: The book begins by stating the time period in which the account begins.


The exceptions are Mosiah and Ether. But Ether is really just a variation of Moroni giving his personal account.  So the only odd-ball beginning of a book in the Book of Mormon is Mosiah. Why is Mosiah unique?  The answer is below.


Personal Account


All of the personal accounts begin with the name of the author.


  • “I Nephi having been born of goodly parents...” (1 Nephi)

  • “...After I, Nephi, had made an end of teaching my brethren...” (2 Nephi)

  • “...Nephi gave me, Jacob, a commandment concerning the small plates...” (Jacob)

  • “...I, Enos, knowing my father to be a just man...” (Enos)

  • “Now, behold, I, Jarom, write a few words...” (Jarom)

  • “...I, Omni, being commanded by my father, Jarom...” (Omni)

  • “And now I, Mormon, being about to deliver up the record [to] my son Moroni...” (Words of Mormon)

  • “And now I, Mormon, make a record of the things which I have seen and heard...” (Mormon)

  • “Now I, Moroni, after having made an end of abridging the account of the people of Jared...” (Moroni)


Abridgement


All of the abridgements except for that of Ether begin with identifying a time period in which the account begins.


  • “...in the first year of the reign of the judges over the people of Nephi...” (Alma)

  • “...in the commencement of the fortieth year of the reign of the judges...” (Helaman)

  • “...the ninety and first year had passed away, and it was six hundred years from the time that Lehi left Jerusalem...” (3 Nephi)

  • “...the thirty and fourth year had passed away...” (4 Nephi)


The Exceptions


Moroni's abridgement of Ether starts off as an account of who is doing the abridging.


  • “And now I, Moroni, proceed to give an account of those ancient inhabitants who were destroyed...”  (Ether)


But then there's the really weird beginning--Mosiah.

  • “And now there was no more convention in all the land of Zarahemla...” (Mosiah)


What Happened to Mosiah?


It’s not clear why Mosiah begins suddenly out of nowhere.  But here’s a pretty good theory.  The 116 pages of manuscript that were lost by Martin Harris contained the first two chapters of Mosiah. In the original manuscript of the Book of Mormon, Oliver Cowdery began what we now have as chapter 1 of Mosiah with the heading called “Chapter 3”.  When the printer’s manuscript was being prepared, Cowdery changed “Chapter 3” to “Chapter 1”.  Here’s a link to more of a discussion on that.

Comments

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...
66 comments
Read more

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...
52 comments
Read more

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...
50 comments
Read more