Skip to main content

Destruction of the Family deja vu: Soviet Style

The nuclear family was enemy number one for the Soviet Communists of yesteryear.  Ironically, many of the same tactics applied by the Bolsheviks are being employed in modern-day America.
Said Orlando Figes in his monumental work The Whisperers:
The family was the first arena in which the Bolsheviks engaged the struggle. [T]hey took it as an article of faith that the 'bourgeois family' was socially harmful: it was inward-looking and conservative, a stronghold of religion, superstition, ignorance, and prejudice; [that] it fostered egotism and material acquisitiveness, and oppressed women and children.

The Whisperers, page 8
Bolshevik Communism had as one of its major goals the compelling of women to leave the family and join the workforce, whether they wanted to or not. Their children noticed.  Typical of such memories, Marksena Nizovtseva recalled:
I felt the lack of a mother's attention...and was always jealous of children whose mothers did not work.

ibid. pages 11-12
One way of enticing husbands and fathers, wives and mothers away from their parental and spousal duties was the lure of free love.  This was accomplished by loosening the influence of religion on marriage and family, and by declaring that other social units were equal to the nuclear family.
The new Code on Marriage and the Family (1918) established a legislative framework that clearly aimed to facilitate the breakdown of the traditional family. It removed the influence of the Church from marriage and divorce, making both a process of simple registration with the state.  It granted the same rights to...couples living together.  The result was a huge increase in casual marriages and the highest rate of divorce in the world.

Sexual promiscuity was more pronounced in the Party's youthful ranks than among the Soviet youth in general. Many Bolsheviks regarded sexual license as a form of liberation from bourgeois moral conventions and as a sign of...'modernity'.

ibid page 10-11
Bolshevism used dedication to the Party as a means of tearing families apart.
It was commonplace that the Bolshevik [male] made a bad husband and father because the demands of the Party took him away from the home. 'We Communists don't know our families,' remarked one Moscow Bolshevik.  Bolsheviks were far more likely than non-Party husbands to abandon wives and families.

ibid. page 11
Josef Stalin taught that
A true Bolshevik shouldn't and couldn't have a family, because he should give himself wholly to the party.

ibid. page 2

Stalin set an "excellent" example in this regard by the way he treated his own wife--like a dirty rag when it suited him.

Many of these overt Communist tactics sound eerily familiar in the 21st century. Familial destruction and denegration is all around us.  Conversely, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints stands resolute in declaring the family to be the fundamental unit of society.
We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator's plan for the eternal destiny of His children.

We warn that individuals who violate covenants of chastity, who abuse spouse or offspring, or who fail to fulfill family responsibilities will one day stand accountable before God. Further, we warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.

We call upon responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere to promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society. 
Communism failed, in large part because it destroyed the family. We would be foolish indeed to not learn this fundamental lesson from history.

Comments

  1. Great post. Of course Communism's roots goes back to Adam Weishaupt, who sought to destroy religion, governmental authority, and western culture, which includes marriage and the family.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Insightful, and true. In many ways, Communism was to be the replacement of faith. I'm reading "Witness" by Whittaker Chambers, and this is one of his first points. Communism sought to put man back in the center of the universe, replace God with man's mind.

    http://wp.me/pJXZa-tF

    ReplyDelete
  3. This has also happened sadly to Jews and is terrible, repugnant and depressing

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

Hey, Senator Buttars: "Happy Holidays!!"

Utah Senator Chris Buttars may be a well-meaning individual, but his actions often don't come out that way. His latest lament, with accompanying legislation that businesses use the phrase "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", is at least the third case in point that I am aware of. First, we were entertained by the faux pas made by the Senator in the 2008 Utah Legislative session, when referring to an In reality, America has a Judeo -Christian heritage, so maybe Senator Buttars should change his legislation to "encourage" businesses to advertise with " Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas"...? analogy of a human baby, of declaring that " this baby is black ". Then there was the attempt to help a friend develop his property in Mapleton, Utah, by using the force if his legislative office . Let's see if we can top that... Who cares that businesses hock their Christmas wares by using the term "Happy Holidays"? I