Skip to main content

Destruction of the Family deja vu: Soviet Style

The nuclear family was enemy number one for the Soviet Communists of yesteryear.  Ironically, many of the same tactics applied by the Bolsheviks are being employed in modern-day America.
Said Orlando Figes in his monumental work The Whisperers:
The family was the first arena in which the Bolsheviks engaged the struggle. [T]hey took it as an article of faith that the 'bourgeois family' was socially harmful: it was inward-looking and conservative, a stronghold of religion, superstition, ignorance, and prejudice; [that] it fostered egotism and material acquisitiveness, and oppressed women and children.

The Whisperers, page 8
Bolshevik Communism had as one of its major goals the compelling of women to leave the family and join the workforce, whether they wanted to or not. Their children noticed.  Typical of such memories, Marksena Nizovtseva recalled:
I felt the lack of a mother's attention...and was always jealous of children whose mothers did not work.

ibid. pages 11-12
One way of enticing husbands and fathers, wives and mothers away from their parental and spousal duties was the lure of free love.  This was accomplished by loosening the influence of religion on marriage and family, and by declaring that other social units were equal to the nuclear family.
The new Code on Marriage and the Family (1918) established a legislative framework that clearly aimed to facilitate the breakdown of the traditional family. It removed the influence of the Church from marriage and divorce, making both a process of simple registration with the state.  It granted the same rights to...couples living together.  The result was a huge increase in casual marriages and the highest rate of divorce in the world.

Sexual promiscuity was more pronounced in the Party's youthful ranks than among the Soviet youth in general. Many Bolsheviks regarded sexual license as a form of liberation from bourgeois moral conventions and as a sign of...'modernity'.

ibid page 10-11
Bolshevism used dedication to the Party as a means of tearing families apart.
It was commonplace that the Bolshevik [male] made a bad husband and father because the demands of the Party took him away from the home. 'We Communists don't know our families,' remarked one Moscow Bolshevik.  Bolsheviks were far more likely than non-Party husbands to abandon wives and families.

ibid. page 11
Josef Stalin taught that
A true Bolshevik shouldn't and couldn't have a family, because he should give himself wholly to the party.

ibid. page 2

Stalin set an "excellent" example in this regard by the way he treated his own wife--like a dirty rag when it suited him.

Many of these overt Communist tactics sound eerily familiar in the 21st century. Familial destruction and denegration is all around us.  Conversely, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints stands resolute in declaring the family to be the fundamental unit of society.
We, the First Presidency and the Council of the Twelve Apostles of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, solemnly proclaim that marriage between a man and a woman is ordained of God and that the family is central to the Creator's plan for the eternal destiny of His children.

We warn that individuals who violate covenants of chastity, who abuse spouse or offspring, or who fail to fulfill family responsibilities will one day stand accountable before God. Further, we warn that the disintegration of the family will bring upon individuals, communities, and nations the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.

We call upon responsible citizens and officers of government everywhere to promote those measures designed to maintain and strengthen the family as the fundamental unit of society. 
Communism failed, in large part because it destroyed the family. We would be foolish indeed to not learn this fundamental lesson from history.

Comments

  1. Great post. Of course Communism's roots goes back to Adam Weishaupt, who sought to destroy religion, governmental authority, and western culture, which includes marriage and the family.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Insightful, and true. In many ways, Communism was to be the replacement of faith. I'm reading "Witness" by Whittaker Chambers, and this is one of his first points. Communism sought to put man back in the center of the universe, replace God with man's mind.

    http://wp.me/pJXZa-tF

    ReplyDelete
  3. This has also happened sadly to Jews and is terrible, repugnant and depressing

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...