Skip to main content

Yes to the "Utah Compact", No to Arizona-Style Immigration Reform

A couple of months ago, I wrote here that I prefer the style of immigration reform supported by Utah Senator Luz Robles, rather than that being proposed by Representative Steve Sandstrom. I'm not sure whether Senator Robles was involved in today's announcement of the Utah Compact, but it is what I strongly support as an excellent foundation for immigration reform in Utah--and anywhere.

Just last week a family was deported back to Argentina from Utah, after they had lived here for ten years, and during which time they had been trying to become American citizens.  Their children are completely unfamiliar with Argentina, and they face danger now that they have returned (or in some cases arrived for the first time) in Argentina.  Is this what immigration should be?  No.

Good immigration law should do its best to keep families together and to not place them in dangerous circumstances. I hope that these kinds of deportations will soon be a thing of the past.  Several community leaders, in the past few minutes, have come together at the Utah State Capitol to ask that, in consideration of immigration reform, Utah legislators should take family health and integrity into account.

Consensus is building around what is called the Utah Compact, which is divided into five areas
  • FEDERAL SOLUTIONS — That "Immigration is a federal policy issue..."
  • LAW ENFORCEMENT —  That local law enforcement should "focus on criminal activities, not civil violations of federal code."
  • FAMILIES — That all laws should support and foster strong families and "and improve the health, education and well-being of all Utah children."
  • ECONOMY —  That we should recognize and respect the significant contributions that all immigrants make to Utah's economy.
  • A FREE SOCIETY — That free societies are inclusive and that we should celebrate all cultures and history, and that "Utah should always be a place that welcomes people of goodwill."
In something so controversial, it is often difficult to remember the paramount issue, that all people are children of God, and that we should strive to continually treat each other as such.  The LDS Church, however, is one organization that has not looked beyond the mark of this most important aspect.  The Church of Jesus Christ today announced its support for the principles contained in the Utah Compact. In its statement, the Church said
"We follow Jesus Christ by loving our neighbors. The Savior taught that the meaning of 'neighbor' includes all of God's children, in all places, at all times.

"We recognize an ever-present need to strengthen families. Families are meant to be together. Forced separation of working parents from their children weakens families and damages society.
Now that's the kind of immigration reform I'm talking about. Arizona-style immigration laws were no doubt crafted in large part by people of good will who were trying to solve what they see as a clear problem. But the Arizona will leave a gaping and festering wound, and the approach won't work.

The Utah Compact approach will work. As a veteran of the United States military who has gone overseas to protect America's freedom, I hope to look back on Veteran's Day 2010 as not only the day that due respect was paid to military veterans, but also the beginning of the triumph of respect for diversity and the day that good, healthy American immigration reform began.

Labels:

Comments

  1. Ryan11/13/2010 10:22:00 AM

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha....stupid tea party idiots believed Lee was going to be different. Ha ha ha ha you got duped. Ha ha ha names lobbyist as his cheif of staff. Nothing changes. Should've voted Granato.

    ReplyDelete
  2. JBT11/14/2010 08:08:00 PM

    For once you and I agree Frank (except for the people of good will part).

    Not one Democrat in the Arizona Legislature supported or voted for that bill. It was pushed by conservative Republicans who were driven by fear and prejudice and a need to strike out at President Obama and a Democratic Congress.

    We have the same coalition in Utah based mainly in Utah Country who identify themselves with the Patrick Henry Caucus. Hopefully the LDS Church weighing in on the issue is enough to thwart their "bad will" in this state.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Frank Staheli11/15/2010 09:13:00 AM

    I'm glad we mostly agree. You are probably right, and I had wishful thinking on the "people of goodwill" part. There was an interesting NPR article a couple of weeks back that indicated that a group called ALEC(?) and the Corrections Corporation of America, which has a TON of conflict of interest in supporting the Arizona law, were pushing hard to get it passed (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=130833741).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...
66 comments
Read more

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...
52 comments
Read more

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...
50 comments
Read more