Skip to main content

Stop Blaming Me for Illegal Immigration


There are a lot of reasons that people immigrate illegally to the United States. But instead of blaming those of us who think it's important to follow the law, let's identify the real problems and fix them.

Yesterday in the Deseret News, John Renteria highlighted the unprofessional way that Federal agents raided the Swift Meat Company in Hyrum Utah recently. I agree that the raid should have been done in a much more civil manner. People weren't even allowed to go back inside and get their coats. Children didn't know where their parents were, etc. Seriously, I think the feds have been watching too many Antonio Banderas movies or something.

But I want to look at it from another point of view--would the Feds have raided Swift if there hadn't been a lot of illegal immigrants there? I know, the question sounds absurd, but please just humor me for a few paragraphs.

I want to discuss a couple of points that Mr. Renteria makes. First, he seems surprised (or sarcastic) when he says:

Not surprising, more than 95 percent of illegal workers snared are Hispanic.
I assume he means that he's not surprised that the Feds would make an exaggerated issue of arresting more Hispanic illegals than are in the population. An NPR report indicates that 57% of illegals come from Mexico, and another 24% come from the rest of Latin America. It's not hard to imagine that a higher percentage than that exists in Utah.

Next, he states

As Americans, we need just to look into our own hearts and ponder, "What would I do in the same situation?"

I think this is an important point. As I mentioned above, peace officers have no business acting like...well almost like the FBI did to the Branch Davidians in Waco, Texas about 10 years ago. But that's not the only problem.

He raises another important issue:

...the conditions and situation that forced these less fortunate families to defy immigration laws has not been remedied by the raid.

I agree with Renteria's sentiment, but since he does not identify what those conditions are, I suspect we disagree at least on some of the conditions (i.e. the problems). The main condition or problem that I think needs to be remedied is the Mexican economy. The problem with the Mexican the corruption endemic to Mexican society that starts clear at the top--the Mexican government.

I'm not sure we can do a whole lot about it other than pointing it out, but it sure would make me feel like people are serious about the immigration problem and that I wasn't getting blamed all the time for Mexico's shortcomings.

I do not agree with one of his solutions, which is to ban federal raids of businesses that hire illegals until congress implements reforms. (I don't support the way the Feds raided Swift.)

But I do agree wholeheartedly with this statement:

A proactive solution that will resolve existing immigration woes cannot be guided by fear, ignorance and maligned feelings of hatred about our inevitable coexistence in the future. The world is a smaller place, especially on this continent.

Whatever the solution is, it must be a solution of integrity. It must be a solution that is both legal and, as Mr. Renteria says, that causes us to "look into our own hearts and ponder, 'What would I do in the same situation?'"

Comments

  1. So what happened to the factory? Until there are real penalties on the employers who hire illegal immigrants, the problem will continue.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Excellent point. I agree. A FoxNews article said "No civil or criminal charges have yet been filed against Swift or any current employees.".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Frank,
    This is Shane, formerly of Elberta. First, if the Feds take a large number of employees from the business, the damage is done. To suggest that this is no big deal because they didn't press charges missis the point. Second, suggesting that Mexico should fix their economy is no suggestion at all unless they are reading your blog. The US is already substantially subsidizing the Mexican economy through imports, etc. What more do you suggest we do? I believe that the main reason we have so many illegal immigrants is that they can't immigrate legally. There is a market for labor to migrate from Mexico to the US. Unless there is a major moral or National security argument, the government should't be trying to manipulate market forces. Border security should keep criminals and terrorists out but allow legitimate labor to immigrate. Any immigration policy that ignores market forces is bound to fail.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Shane,

    Good to hear from you! Hope everything is going well for you and your family. Thanks for your comments.

    I agree that market forces are important in this process, and that's why they're coming to America. If Mexico were more of a land of opportunity (and more Mexicans 'stayed home'), it would be interesting to see how that would affect the US economy.

    I hadn't thought about it the way you put it that the damage is done to the company when they take all the employees. Yes, but I still think that they are more likely to think twice if the company is directly penalized.

    I don't know enough about the problems of legal immigration to comment other than to say that it seems that we need to make the process easier. Because we can surely assimilate at least most of those who want to come.

    My main point about the Mexican government is that if everyone knew how corrupt it is (I guess not too many people know how corrupt ours is!!) it might have a shaming effect on it and improve its integrity. At any rate, a big way to make Mexicans more productive and have a higher standard of living is for them to stop taking the crap from their government.

    And by the way, I think millions of people should "read[ my] blog"!!!

    Thanks again.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...