Skip to main content

The Stem Cell Debate is Over

Now that scientists have discovered a way to emulate embryonic stem cells with adult stem cells, the need to use embryonic stem cells is over. But don't let that fool you into thinking that people will stop using them.

James A. Thomson was the scientist who, about ten years ago, isolated and discovered embryonic stem cells. Shortly thereafter, many scientists and politicians held embryonic stem cells as a panacea for all ills. It hasn't turned out that way. As I recently wrote here, embryonic stem cells have been the cure for exactly ZERO diseases. On the other hand, adult stem cells have been beneficial in about 60 therapies.

Mr. Thomson, co-discoverer of the new adult-to-embryonic stem cell method, was always a little bit squeamish about the result of his discovery. He said:
"If human embryonic stem cell research does not make you at least a little bit uncomfortable, you have not thought about it enough."
He's now made a discovery that means we don't have to use embryonic stem cells in stem cell research. Despite the fact that they haven't cured anything, embryonic stem cells have been all the political rage. But it turns out that George W. Bush was right. Charles Krauthammer puts it this way:
Because the moral disquiet that James Thomson always felt — and that George Bush forced the country to confront — helped lead him and others to find some ethically neutral way to produce stem cells. Providence then saw to it that the technique be so elegant and beautiful that scientific reasons alone will now incline even the most willful researchers to leave the human embryo alone.
I hope that happens. But I'm not confident that it will. For an issue that is so politically charged, I suspect that embryonic stem cell research will continue to be championed as it has been for the last decade. For no good reason.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Craig12/03/2007 04:38:00 PM

    Just like global warming and ethanol, this is an example of politics driving science. You are right that politicians will not let this stop them from pushing government funding for research on embryonic stem cells.

    OTOH, I'm not going to accept right now the idea that this technique is the panacea it is promised to be. Media and government hyping of bad science has taught me to reserve judgment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Frank Staheli12/03/2007 05:14:00 PM

    If you're referring to the new technique, I agree. I've always been of the mind anyway that adult stems cells are where its at, because embryonic have cured nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jason The12/04/2007 11:22:00 PM

    It's worth noting two very important facts before claiming this debate is nicely wrapped up.

    1. The recent discovery was achieved only through stem cell research prior to Bush's short-sighted, and reactionary assault on the research.

    2. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning that they have the ability to develop into any type of human tissue. The possible uses are (obviously) endless.

    This debate has always been the possibilities of research in medical science pitted against anti-abortion activism. This recent development does little to end the debate, but rather brings it (again) to the forefront.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Frank Staheli12/05/2007 10:14:00 PM

    Bush did not assault the research. He said that there could be no federal funding for new embryonic stem cell lines. The research can continue (it's not illegal), and the research that led to this marvelous discovery did not need any new embryonic stem cell lines for it to succeed.

    The point of the entire article is that adult stem cells now have the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.

    You mischaracterize what the debate is about. The possibilities are still there (I'll put my wager on the probabilities of adult stem cells providing the cures as they have exclusively heretofore done). The government should not support policies that are unnecessary.

    It brings to the forefront that no further debate is necessary, because the only reason now for people to advocate the use of embryonic stem cells is to indicate that it's okay to needlessly take human life.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

School Vouchers: "The Bramble Memo"

$429 million? What? Where? The legislative fiscal analyst for the State of Utah calculated the costs to the public schools over the next 13 years if school vouchers are implemented. It said the costs would be $5.5M in the first year, and $71M in the 13th year. Suddenly, the number I have started seeing thrown around was $429 million, the total costs for vouchers over 13 years. Where did that number come from? Enter the mysterious "Bramble Memo". In the past few days several of us (Jeremy, Utah Taxpayer, Craig, Sara, Urban Koda, Jesse, and me) have (sometimes?) enjoyed a lively discussion about school vouchers in Utah . Jeremy clarified to me the costs of the venture by linking to a copy of the Utah Legislative Fiscal Analyst's Impartial Analysis (LFA) of the costs of Vouchers , found on "The Senate Site". In my previous voucher article, I quoted some of Lavar Webb's article from last Sunday's Deseret News, wherein he stated that those total costs ...
66 comments
Read more

Why Do Liberals Coddle the Radical Islamic Monster?

Many liberals and progressives in the United States and elsewhere support a radical Islamic fundamentalist movement which, if it came to power, would quickly wipe out their liberal progressive ideology. Why then, do so many liberals coddle the monster that would destroy them? The Answer lies in their long-stemmed hatred of Western liberty and free markets. Dick Morris' new revelation of Hillary Clinton's ties to Islamic fundamentalist terrorism provides an excellent backdrop for me to ask the question that Greg Allen of The Right Balance has been asking for quite some time, to wit: If many liberals stand for free sexuality, homosexuality, the use of drugs, binge drinking, and other mindless expressions of individuality, why do so many of them also look the other way when it comes to Islamic fundamentalism? Don't they know that Iran has put to death as many as 4,000 homosexuals? Don't they know that if Islamists come to power they will not only make sexual perversi...
52 comments
Read more

The Inhumanity of Bob Lonsberry: Waterboarding, Concentration Camps, and the the Bataan Death March

KNRS 570 radio talk show host Bob Lonsberry advocated waterboarding and other forms of torture during his show on April 21, 2009. More grotesquely, he was beaming with pride about his advocacy campaign. It's difficult to imagine then, that, by the same rationale, had Lonsberry been a German at the time of Hitler, or a Japanese during the Bataan Death March, that he would not have advocated torture of Jews in the concentration camps or the bayoneting and shooting of American soldiers on the Bataan trail. Torture, Torture, Everywhere! Nearly 80,000 American soldiers were captured by the Japanese in the To contemplate a discussion about whether or not torture is legal or whether it even works, it is first required to come to the conclusion that 'I am a child of God, but my adversary is a monkey'. Phillipines in 1942 and forced to march with no food and very little water for six days. If a man stumbled, if he didn't respond quickly to a command, or if he tried to get wat...
50 comments
Read more