Skip to main content

The Stem Cell Debate is Over

Now that scientists have discovered a way to emulate embryonic stem cells with adult stem cells, the need to use embryonic stem cells is over. But don't let that fool you into thinking that people will stop using them.

James A. Thomson was the scientist who, about ten years ago, isolated and discovered embryonic stem cells. Shortly thereafter, many scientists and politicians held embryonic stem cells as a panacea for all ills. It hasn't turned out that way. As I recently wrote here, embryonic stem cells have been the cure for exactly ZERO diseases. On the other hand, adult stem cells have been beneficial in about 60 therapies.

Mr. Thomson, co-discoverer of the new adult-to-embryonic stem cell method, was always a little bit squeamish about the result of his discovery. He said:
"If human embryonic stem cell research does not make you at least a little bit uncomfortable, you have not thought about it enough."
He's now made a discovery that means we don't have to use embryonic stem cells in stem cell research. Despite the fact that they haven't cured anything, embryonic stem cells have been all the political rage. But it turns out that George W. Bush was right. Charles Krauthammer puts it this way:
Because the moral disquiet that James Thomson always felt — and that George Bush forced the country to confront — helped lead him and others to find some ethically neutral way to produce stem cells. Providence then saw to it that the technique be so elegant and beautiful that scientific reasons alone will now incline even the most willful researchers to leave the human embryo alone.
I hope that happens. But I'm not confident that it will. For an issue that is so politically charged, I suspect that embryonic stem cell research will continue to be championed as it has been for the last decade. For no good reason.

Comments

  1. Just like global warming and ethanol, this is an example of politics driving science. You are right that politicians will not let this stop them from pushing government funding for research on embryonic stem cells.

    OTOH, I'm not going to accept right now the idea that this technique is the panacea it is promised to be. Media and government hyping of bad science has taught me to reserve judgment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If you're referring to the new technique, I agree. I've always been of the mind anyway that adult stems cells are where its at, because embryonic have cured nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's worth noting two very important facts before claiming this debate is nicely wrapped up.

    1. The recent discovery was achieved only through stem cell research prior to Bush's short-sighted, and reactionary assault on the research.

    2. Embryonic stem cells are pluripotent, meaning that they have the ability to develop into any type of human tissue. The possible uses are (obviously) endless.

    This debate has always been the possibilities of research in medical science pitted against anti-abortion activism. This recent development does little to end the debate, but rather brings it (again) to the forefront.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bush did not assault the research. He said that there could be no federal funding for new embryonic stem cell lines. The research can continue (it's not illegal), and the research that led to this marvelous discovery did not need any new embryonic stem cell lines for it to succeed.

    The point of the entire article is that adult stem cells now have the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.

    You mischaracterize what the debate is about. The possibilities are still there (I'll put my wager on the probabilities of adult stem cells providing the cures as they have exclusively heretofore done). The government should not support policies that are unnecessary.

    It brings to the forefront that no further debate is necessary, because the only reason now for people to advocate the use of embryonic stem cells is to indicate that it's okay to needlessly take human life.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

The Legend of Enkidu and Shamhat: Wait!...Did I just Read About Adam and Eve???

The story of Enkidu and Shamhat seems similar to that of Adam and Eve.  See what similarities you can find in my description of the story of Enkidu, Shamhat, and Enkidu's alter-ego, Gilgamesh below.