Skip to main content

"Checketts" Your Integrity at the Door

Perhaps it's blatant shysterism, and then again expectations regarding a contribution of $7.5 million for a soccer complex may just be two sets of expectations that have passed like two ships in the night. As you may infer from the title of this post, I think it is the former.


I don't know Dave Checketts, and if I did, I might probably think he was a pretty good guy. But in my experience in city government, I've met a fair number of people who either did a great job pretending to be good guys, or who were good guys except when they got into a business deal where a lot of money was involved.

With all the posturing, bullying, and name calling that went into finally acquiring county funds for a soccer stadium--by 'virtue' of state dictation of how such county funds be used--I suspect Dave Checketts is involved in a deal that involves too much money for his integrity to handle.

I was surprised (...only for a minute) the other day, when I found out that Mr. Checketts thinks that the $7.5 million he had pledged to give for a youth soccer facility in Salt Lake City is now an investment rather than a donation. In the same breath, I salute Mayor Rocky Anderson for calling Mr. Checketts' bluff, and for finally recognizing that Mr. Checketts doesn't have even a thimble-full of integrity in his business dealings. But what took him so long?

Do you think Rocky has given his Real soccer jersey back yet?

Soccer in Utah is a great thing. I enjoy watching and playing soccer more than any other sport except for basketball, and perhaps football. This is why I am tired of the shenanigans being pulled by Mr. Checketts, which will ultimately redound to the detriment of soccer in Utah, and Utah in general.

The Salt Lake Tribune's editorial of a couple days ago says

Real is getting its public funds. It should cough up the donation. If that donation is not forthcoming, the flow of public funds to the Real stadium project should cease.

At least we all know now. I don't think we need any other indications of Mr. Checketts' "looking-out-for-number-one-itis" than what has already happened.

I think it "should cease" now.

Comments

  1. Frank,

    Excellent use of the word "shysterism". Checketts is a snake that should never have recieved a dime of public funds.

    A soccer stadium is not a public good. It is not a necessary service. There is absolutely no good philosophical or economic reason for the soccer stadium.

    I hope that the stadium project fails and Checketts moves the team and his shysterism to another state and we never have to deal with him again.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting. If you have a Google/Blogger account, to be apprised of ongoing comment activity on this article, please click the "Subscribe" link below.

Popular posts from this blog

Red Clothing and Resurrection: Jesus Christ's Second Coming

The scriptures teach that when Christ comes again to the earth, that he will be wearing red apparel. Why red ? They also teach that at Christ's coming, many of the dead will become resurrected. Will this only include members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? Not by a long shot, no matter what some Mormon might tell you.

To Have the Compassion of an Ogre

At least when it comes to using government as a weapon of compassion, I have the compassion of the ogre. I will explain below why I think government cannot and should not be in the business of compassion. The force of government has caused many people to show less compassion to their fellow men. On the other hand, some of the best things happen when government is not compassionate. In such circumstances, individuals personally begin to display more compassion. One such instance of this happened recently in Utah when the governor asked the legislature to convene a special session in order to (among other things) provide special monies to pay for dental care for the disabled . If they didn't fund the governor's compassion project, it would make the legislators look even more heartless in a year where the budget surplus was projected to be at least $150 million. In spite of these political odds, the legislature did not grant the $2 million that 40,000 members of the disabled

Hey, Senator Buttars: "Happy Holidays!!"

Utah Senator Chris Buttars may be a well-meaning individual, but his actions often don't come out that way. His latest lament, with accompanying legislation that businesses use the phrase "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays", is at least the third case in point that I am aware of. First, we were entertained by the faux pas made by the Senator in the 2008 Utah Legislative session, when referring to an In reality, America has a Judeo -Christian heritage, so maybe Senator Buttars should change his legislation to "encourage" businesses to advertise with " Happy Hanukkah and Merry Christmas"...? analogy of a human baby, of declaring that " this baby is black ". Then there was the attempt to help a friend develop his property in Mapleton, Utah, by using the force if his legislative office . Let's see if we can top that... Who cares that businesses hock their Christmas wares by using the term "Happy Holidays"? I